sorted by:
new
hottopinsightfulfun

Like a baby..

by 90stimemachine to /s/GenderCritical from (imgflip.com)

Clip: ACLU would be perfectly happy with a women's team made up of all TiMs by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]90stimemachine 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Imagine being that woman. It’s like she just broke on camera - her idealism collapsed under the weight of its own bullshit. Did anyone else see that?

Clip: ACLU would be perfectly happy with a women's team made up of all TiMs by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]90stimemachine 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

  1. Culturally, they’ve never been told ‘no’.
  2. Timing - it’s a great time to be an identity grifter, with social media and the passion of acceptance and inclusivity in the air. Claim oppression and win woke points or a gofundme.
  3. Porn and porn-addicted men brainwashing the youth, resulting in thoughts like, “maybe I really am a trans lesbian due to x,y,z”. It’s the lost leading the lost.
  4. Misogynistic men in public office or service emboldening this type of behavior. Not talking about Biden - I truly don’t think he knows much about this and I have hope for some moderacy in his administration eventually. I mean that ogre Adrian Harrop. And Morgane Oger, too.

Kara Dansky, WHRC, nails it on Tucker Carlson show, discussing Biden's "trans" EO by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]90stimemachine 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I watched this. I can’t believe I watched Tucker Carlson and actually enjoyed it. Well done, Kara! Would have been fun to hear what the producer was saying in his ear.

Disturbing: Is this "Rachel" Levine or a clone? by our_team_is_winning in GenderCritical

[–]90stimemachine 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If this is him that would be insane - like, this is next level for a medical doctor in the public sphere. Maybe it’s before he got into state office?

Bret and Heather Weinstein discuss Biden’s EO and Rachel Levine. The most comprehensive and logical break down so far that I’ve seen. They discuss the sneaky language in the bill, pointing on how it’s used to serve two purposes. They also discuss the odd selection of Levine. Heather is based <3

by 90stimemachine to /s/GenderCritical from (m.youtube.com)