whatever

whatever

log in
sign up
subreddits
search
sidebar

Just reposting the pyramid of debate as a reminder for the new influx of users. Didn't know where else to put it.(wikispooks.com)

384 points383 points386 points submitted by piss
top 100 commentsshow all 152

magnora7 31 insightful - 6 fun31 insightful - 5 fun32 insightful - 6 fun 3 years ago

Nice.

Just want to add that saidit's official version of the pyramid of debate has an extra level at the bottom: Advocating violence against individuals or groups.

https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

aThievingStableboy 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

gqeragawefsdcx

xigoi 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun 3 years ago

We allow free speech. Just because these opinions are on the site, doesn't mean they're widely supported.

aThievingStableboy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

dfbva

xigoi 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Yes, it is contrary to the stated goals. Some people just can't be reasoned with. It's the same with Saidit antisemites as with Reddit SJWs, but with the difference that you won't get banned for disagreeing with them.

Jesus 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

The top post doesn't say satanic Rabbi, it shows a rabbi speaking what he believes and practices. The top post is a book called this:

"https://files.catbox.moe/1zgcgy.pdf

It is largwly about Judaism and what Yeshua called the "synagouge of Satan" or those who pretend to be Jews but are not

I don't agree with a lot of it. But it is critiquing Judaism and Jews, which means it is fine to post.

[deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

[removed]

xigoi 19 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Ah yes, the typical SJW narrative: anyone who disagrees with you is a Nazi. Nice try, nobody believes that here.

load more comments (2 replies)

Jesus 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Nazi ideology is what? Critiquing Judaism or Israel? Not all Jews are Semitic, all arabs are also semitic which means if any post on /r/Judaism or any other sub is what you call "anti-semitic", it most also be against all arabs including Palestinians.

You are using a misnomer. Anti-Judaic is a better word to use. And guess what, you can be that on saidit or anti-muslim or neither.

There's plenty of "expel all the muslims in America" users on here, which I find despicable. That being said I don't call for their censorship.

AllStr8SexIsRape 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Anti-zionism is antisemitism and antisemitism is racism. Jews cannot be racist because:

—Jews are people of color, and calling people of color racist is psychological projection by racist whites.

—Racism = power + prejudice. Power requires strength in numbers Jews don't have and goyim do. Therefore only goyim can be racist.

—Arabs are white and therefore racist. Iranians are even whiter and therefore even more racist.

Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

I know you're being facetious. And if not, you're beainwashed beyond belief. Jews can be very racist to other people, just as a non-Jew can be.

Goyim is a derogatory word.

Crystalmenthol 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Everybody understands what "anti-semitic" means, it means an attack on Jews or the Jewish faith. Changing the topic to etymology when the word has clearly moved beyond its roots is a transparent attempt to confuse the subject, not a good faith debate tactic.

Is there room to criticize Israel the country? Absolutely. Is there room to openly discuss ancient traditions from all religions, for example which oppress women and exclude outsiders? Sure.

Where it starts to get hairy is when someone asserts that an ancient cabal has been running the world from the shadows for millenia, even though the members of that "cabal" have been systematically oppressed throughout all recorded human history, and were subject to genocide in the past century. Not a very effective shadow-government, if it ever was one.

Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

No, it doesn't. It means, clearly, being anti-semitic, which means being anti-arab, anti-Palestinian and anti-Jewish if the Jew is semitic, as not all Jews are semitic.

Attack on Jewish faith is anti-Judaic, not anti-Semitic. As a Christian I am anti-Judaic and I am against modern Talmudism Jewish supremacism such as what the Likudniks preach and those who are against Yeshua. That doesn't mean I hate them, I just do not agree with their religion or ethnostate.

Neocons are particularly anti-Semitic.

Changing the topic to etymology when the word has clearly moved beyond its roots is a transparent attempt to confuse the subject, not a good faith debate tactic.

Nope, the modern use of it today, stolen by certain Jews is clearly used the wrong way and an insult on anyone with intelligence.

Where it starts to get hairy is when someone asserts that an ancient cabal has been running the world from the shadows for millenia, even though the members of that "cabal" have been systematically oppressed throughout all recorded human history, and were subject to genocide in the past century. Not a very effective shadow-government, if it ever was one.

There's certainly a Jewish mafia as their is an Italian mafia.

Certain Jews have a terrible amount of power and have done terrible things. The common, ordinary Jew is propagandized more than any other person to go along with the Palestinian apartheid based on fear of Pogroms pushed by, most notably, Zionists.

Read Lenni Brenner or Jews against Zionism and you'll see how anti-Semitic many wealthy Zionist Jews really are.

Is Loeb, Schiff, Warburg, Seligman, Guggenheim, Belmont, Rothschild, etc., Jewish? Yes, they are! Who were the people, foreign to the republic, to travel to America and install a centralized, incorporated bank based on permanent public debt? Mostly Frankfurt Jewish bankers, who waited to get their citizenship until after they were successful in the takeover.

Sounds pretty subversive to me!

And funny enough, I'm not blaming Jews as a whole.

Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

I'm not a fan of changing words to mean their opposite or used for something exclusive when the word clearly defines how it is written out.

(Anti) ----- (Semitic)

Arabs are all Semitic

Trump just passed an anti-Semitism bill where he had pedophile Alan Dershowitz speak on his behalf. Now, criticizing Israel or Zionism is anti-Semitic!

That's what happens when you change the meanings of a word via modernism and use it to censor others when it doesn't even mean what you say it does.

Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Certain Likudnik Jewish terrorists orchestrating 9/11 and blaming it on Arabs is pretty anti-Semitic.

buttermouth 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Maybe because there is unspoken truth there? If it keeps coming up country after country, century after century, might there be some truth there? I think many jews are good people but there is a sect called the Sabbetean Frankists that are all about being as evil as they can to bring the end times as soon as they can.

Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Well, Talmud does teach usury on non-Jews.

Many of the first billionaires were Jewish. Jews were great wrh money and banking ans that is particularly why many people in other countries would turn on Jews as a whole rather than a tightly knit of Jewish and non-Jew swindlers.

AllStr8SexIsRape 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun 3 years ago

You say interest, I say reparations.

Only Jews should be allowed to have money because goyim will only waste it on frivolous crap.

AllStr8SexIsRape 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Then those countries will all fall like dominoes as payback for their goy racism.

Crystalmenthol 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Or maybe human nature is just crap in general, and we've been proving that for centuries. Any cabal that secretly runs the world while still allowing its own people to be systematically oppressed and genocided is a pretty lousy cabal, I wouldn't want to be part of that.

[deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

So why is there so much straight up Nazi ideology here? Like, s/Judaism is literally just antisemetic conspiracies

Classic example of tossing out an epithet instead of addressing the central premise. Would be much better to provide solid examples of the "Nazi ideology" you're critiquing and why it is so unacceptable. I'm not sold at all.

aThievingStableboy 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun 3 years ago

abvsetaste

[deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Yeah, what a great attitude to have on a free speech platform. All condescension and ad homeniems, no substance... I personally think this site does a great job at balancing moderation with freedom. Don't know what else you would even want...

Jesus-Christ 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Any criticism involving Jews = Anti-Semetic. Why are you even here if you're just going to complain and not actually provide anything thoughtful?

[deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

[removed]

Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

/u/magnora7 what is this?

Not being Jewish is racism against God. Jews are a race unto ourselves and superior to your worthless cracker goy parasite shit-covered ass.

This is the crap you get from people like this. Ad hominem after ad hominem after ad hominem.

RecordStory 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

When everyone on your site is here because they were banned for hate speech else theyare going to engage in nonstop hate speech. The world doesn't see a difference between Nazis and TERFS, if anything should open peoples eyes about who is behind all this gender critical stuff, its this nazi filled site. The evangelicals and Nazis propagandize dumbass wealthy boomer white lesbians into spreading division in the queer community. Luckily people are wise to the game and send them off to shitholes like this website. All these hateful assholes can hang out with each other, and people like me will come by top screen cap and show normal people just how shitty TERFS and Nazis and Trump supporters are.

AllStr8SexIsRape 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun 3 years ago

Stop calling gays q---r you fucking breeder piece of shit. And calling feminists "Nazis" is right out of the Rush Limbaugh playbook. If acknowledging that tr-ns is a choice and gay isn't makes me a Nazi, then heil JK Rowling!

GConly 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

The world doesn't see a difference between Nazis and TERFS, if

Actually most of the UK population agrees with the evil TERFS in not wanting self ID, or allowing random men access to changing rooms and prisons on their own say so.

Because, you know, sex offending. It's already happened here. Several prison incidents plus one TIM tried to rape a little girl in the ladies loo almost as soon as letting them have access became commonplace.

Turns out that we were misled when we were told that transwomen had female brains, female offending behaviour and were mostly post op homosexuals.

Once that lie started to break down the public sympathy started to dry up like your last date when she saw you naked.

AllStr8SexIsRape 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Because goyism is blasphemy, heterosexuality is perversion, and whiteness is racism.

piss[S] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Oh I thought the one I posted was the official version for some reason. I don't know where I found it then lol. Thanks.

JasonCarswellMental Orgy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

The one you found is most commonly called "Graham's Hierarchy Of Disagreement" found on Wikipedia linking back among many international variations on Wikimedia Commons where you'll also find the newer versions I did, which are also mirrored on InfoGalactic.

piss[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

That does ring a bell now that I see the name actually. Cheers.

magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

It's named after the creator Paul Graham, who is also the founder of ycombinator I later learned.

Extract 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

What do you define as Advocating Violence?
Just curious, after all, without a clear definition this is no different than Reddit's "hate speech" rules.

Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Threatening another person or animal with violence.

Such as:

We should kill "blank"

We should nuke "blank"

I wouldn't mind "blank" killing off "blank@

RecordStory 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

The post telling me "you'll get a bullet too" from user IHateJews is a good metric of what this site is all about

Jesus 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Mention /u/magnora7 and he'll delete anyone who incites violence. It is not allowed here.

Hasbara does this a lot. They will flood the place posting about how "Jews should be killed" etc., pretty disgusting so that other companies will pick up these stigmas when saidit gets bigger in order to discredit the site or even evoke laws to censor. Recent anti-Semitism law makes criticizing Israel anti-Semitic so I can only imagine once the government gets full control over the internet which is what many conservatives ironically condone the censorship campaign of conspiracy theorists and dissenters will truly begin.

Jesus 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun 3 years ago

/u/IHateJews Does not exist?

shadow_wolf7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Why are u lying?

Extract 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Does this expand to groups of people?
Such as, "we should kill all X", "X should just fuck off and die", "a good X is a dead X", etc?

Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

No, it should not. Because then any censor could catagorize groups willy nilly for his own censorship agenda.

The first one is inciting violence.

The 2nd isn't threatening someone with violence. It's a saying but is very low on the pyramid of debate.

The last is inciting violence.

These are my opinions though.

lyth 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

That's great. Thanks for sharing.

[deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

[deleted]

Leo_Littlebook 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

That is nonsense. For example, the following is valid dialectic:

First-time 1st-degree murderers often later commit multiple murders, are expensive to house, and have low rehabilitation success. Moreover, a visible prompt death penalty reduces the murder rate by X%. Therefore, 1st degree murders should be promptly and visibly executed.

What you should say instead is that for legal and financial reasons you are unwilling to host calls for violence against people, especially ones that are egregious, inflammatory, or politically incorrect. It has nothing to do with the pyramid of debate.

magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

What you should say instead is that for legal and financial reasons you are unwilling to host calls for violence against people, especially ones that are egregious, inflammatory, or politically incorrect. It has nothing to do with the pyramid of debate.

That's also true, but that doesn't mean I don't also care about the pyramid of debate. The two are not mutually exclusive.

load more comments (3 replies)

djhdlkguhaeil 9 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 7 fun 3 years ago

Remember, if you explicitly refute the central point of someone's argument you can also call them a poopy head.

teelo 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

What if I simply completely agree with the commenter above, while simultaneously calling them a poopy head?

Theres kind of one problem with SaidIt being built around the pyramid of debate: what about comments that aren't disagreeing?

[deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

what about comments that aren't disagreeing?

yeah the pyramid doesn't really seem designed to address those. but it can kinda be adapted imo -- did you provide high quality evidence and a clear argument? was your argument ad-hominem, or addressing the information/ideas/topic? did you call anyone an ass hat?

JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Untrue.

However, you may push out a movement that their scattered excretion is sloppy crap and: firmly log their feculent foundations, number two: discharge their incomplete kernels of concepts, and turdly: waste their shitty statements. Butt in the end, you defecately doo smell like an asstroll.

Honey is always better than vinegar, especially when they lose their doody (resist stooping) and gain the respect of readers and peers by maintaining a modicum of decency.

Double_A 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun 3 years ago

So Name-Calling and Ad hominem attacks are the foundation of how to interact here? Without saying which layers are ok and which not, this doesn't make sense at all... unless this is a cheeky way of saying everything is allowed?

noice 21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

The lower portions are considered lower quality/value. Maybe a pyramid is not the best representation, since it's associated in the US with the 'food pyramid' where the layers have the meaning you're implying. A ladder might make more intuitive sense that high = good

[deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

and you attempt to climb a ladder to get higher. I like it.

Marsupial 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

By who? This is just a picture with several different types of debate. I'd say various styles of debate may be useful for different context. Sometimes "reponding to tone" is better. "Refutation" sometimes gives time and attention to a post that shouldn't be given that much highlight. These are just different styles of managing a debate, not a pyramid from good to bad.

BravoVictor 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun 3 years ago

So Name-Calling and Ad hominem attacks are the foundation of how to interact here?

You got it, dick-butt.

/s

thoughtcriminal 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

You can converse at any level of the pyramid but repeated dragging the conversation down the pyramid can result in action against your account.

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

xigoi 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

I think the implication is that lower levels are worse, but more widespread.

Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Let's see, the bottom level gets you banned. So, start from that point and figure it out.

JasonCarswellMental Orgy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

The SaidIt FAQ is always found at the foot of every page and should answer most common questions.

RecordStory 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Everybody here are baby Nazis. If they werent garbage people, they'd be on Reddit, but they got banned. Let's read it people pop in every once in awhile to laugh at you clowns.

BravoVictor 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun 3 years ago

Redditor: "Wait, there are levels beyond ad hominem?"

Extract 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun 3 years ago

Of course - there is also doxxing.

[deleted] 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun 3 years ago

[deleted]

Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

No you're not.

neovulcan 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Been getting slowly disgusted with Reddit over the past few years, but didn't know where to go. Seeing this as a prominent feature here gives me hope I've chosen the right new community.

Cindy 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

OP is an ass hat

bald-janitor 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun 3 years ago

Ok female

lyth 7 insightful - 7 fun7 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 7 fun 3 years ago

Ok male

King_Brutus 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun 3 years ago

Ok person

Cindy 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

Ok traitor

BravoVictor 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun 3 years ago

Did you just assume zhe's gender?!

piss[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

i dont wear hats

Cindy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

No need to get pissy!

piss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

hats make my scalp itch i dont like it. my uncle wears a lot of hats

mrgoober 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun 3 years ago

why did you make it faggot colors?

[deleted] 12 insightful - 12 fun12 insightful - 11 fun13 insightful - 12 fun 3 years ago

to upset you

Wrang1er 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

I really wish there was a downvote button...

King_Brutus 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Even better, there's a "hide" button!

BravoVictor 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Where? I know Reddit had that feature, but I don't see it on Saidit. Just permalink/save/report/reply.

King_Brutus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

It's the little [-] icon to the left of the "insightful/fun" buttons. It's not the same as reddit's version but it serves largely the same function.

load more comments (1 reply)
load more comments (2 replies)

xigoi 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

This comment would fall somewhere between Ad Hominem and Name Calling.

[deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

reminder that 1A trumps the pyramid, lol

JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Hey BN350. Haven't seen you for a while. I feel like I should know what 1A means in a pop culture sense. Am I wrong?

[deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

lol, wavin there, 1A = first amendment, lol

JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Duh. Of course. Fanx Fren.

[deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

yw rofl

ManWithABanana 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Thanks for putting that up !

It's also available from https://saidit.net/wiki/index which you can get to from any Saidit page on the bottom.

King_Brutus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

I wonder if the spergs on Reddit have ever seen this.

NutmegPluto 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

This is tryhard af, can we not just shitpost sometimes? Debate is a waste of time

fuckCNN123 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Let us strive.

[deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

The real question is: Does the pyramid of debate apply to said it admins: https://saidit.net/s/censorship/comments/54iz/why_i_dont_believe_saidit_will_be_a_free_speech/

JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

That's the old version. Find the newer version around SaidIt and in the FAQ (found at the foot of every page). Also, feel free to read or contribute to this article about SaidIt.net.

m68k 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Question, where do I normally fit in? I post alot of :3

:3

midnight305 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Yep I already got the young bucks calling me names. I have to admit I actually like it. I mean there so creative and I cant remember the last time someone was creative in their insults and used different names to describe me .

It's so nice and refreshing it makes my heart skip a beat.

load more comments (7 replies)