No, it doesn't. It means, clearly, being anti-semitic, which means being anti-arab, anti-Palestinian and anti-Jewish if the Jew is semitic, as not all Jews are semitic.

Attack on Jewish faith is anti-Judaic, not anti-Semitic. As a Christian I am anti-Judaic and I am against modern Talmudism Jewish supremacism such as what the Likudniks preach and those who are against Yeshua. That doesn't mean I hate them, I just do not agree with their religion or ethnostate.

Neocons are particularly anti-Semitic.

Changing the topic to etymology when the word has clearly moved beyond its roots is a transparent attempt to confuse the subject, not a good faith debate tactic.

Nope, the modern use of it today, stolen by certain Jews is clearly used the wrong way and an insult on anyone with intelligence.

Where it starts to get hairy is when someone asserts that an ancient cabal has been running the world from the shadows for millenia, even though the members of that "cabal" have been systematically oppressed throughout all recorded human history, and were subject to genocide in the past century. Not a very effective shadow-government, if it ever was one.

There's certainly a Jewish mafia as their is an Italian mafia.

Certain Jews have a terrible amount of power and have done terrible things. The common, ordinary Jew is propagandized more than any other person to go along with the Palestinian apartheid based on fear of Pogroms pushed by, most notably, Zionists.

Read Lenni Brenner or Jews against Zionism and you'll see how anti-Semitic many wealthy Zionist Jews really are.

Is Loeb, Schiff, Warburg, Seligman, Guggenheim, Belmont, Rothschild, etc., Jewish? Yes, they are! Who were the people, foreign to the republic, to travel to America and install a centralized, incorporated bank based on permanent public debt? Mostly Frankfurt Jewish bankers, who waited to get their citizenship until after they were successful in the takeover.

Sounds pretty subversive to me!

And funny enough, I'm not blaming Jews as a whole.