The Pornography Industry is Totally Normal and Healthy (AVN Expo)

submitted by qbn from (youtube.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I offered REASONING. But if it's too complex, ask questions and I'll break it down in easy-to-understand parts.

[–]qbn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

If you had a coherent argument you would have posted it already. This is very boring.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

There is such a thing as porn-induced sexual dysfunction: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039517/

Not to mention the much more obvious porn-induced RELATIONSHIP dysfunction: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/experimentations/201803/4-ways-porn-use-causes-problems

I'll stop there, but as I wrote before, it boils down to conditioning the nervous system to prefer instant gratification, which is purely animal, over delayed gratification, which is purely human. Delayed gratification is why humans have technology, science, language, advancement. Without it, we'd still be using large bones to hack at animals in order to kill, eat, survive.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/obesely-speaking/201401/delayed-gratification-battle-must-be-won

[–]qbn[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That's great, man. You do realize nobody in this thread was arguing for porn being good, right?

Pornography destroys the base of all human enlightenment, evolution, progress and prosperity.

That's hyperbole and a subjective opinion. Perhaps if you had said:

Pornography has a demonstrable negative impact on delayed gratification, which I believe to be the base of all human enlightenment, evolution, progress and prosperity.

Then you would have clearly communicated your argument and kept it reasonable.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You are trolling. That is reprehensible.

[–]qbn[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Once again you have failed to produce an argument in support of your statement.

[–]konoplya 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

eh. you're doubling down because he called out your non argument, so you call him a troll. perhaps try to construct an actual argument next time and learn from this? nah, fucking trolls bro