all 11 comments

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I like how this dosent address any of the actually complaints of the conspiracy theory.

Just, we defiantly did it because the documents we have a very very very hard to fake… trust me… very hard to fake.

How about the fucking video of the lunar module taking off from the moon, who took the video? How did it move? How did they get the film?

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

One explanation made much sense to me.... how the shadows on the moon of the men and their equipment would all be parallel if the light source was the sun. A man-made light source on a studio set would not make parallel shadows.

who took the video?

A simple machine titled the camera, which was left behind on the moon's surface. This video describes how the launch was recorded.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. I’m going to take an i depth look at this later.

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

/s

tv camera on a tripod

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs

This one. It’s moving with the ship.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How about the fucking video of the lunar module taking off from the moon, who took the video? How did it move? How did they get the film?

Obviously the camera man hitched a lift back to earth with this guy.

You surely aren't serious with your question. You would have to have the IQ of an apple to actually, truly think this is a problem, and I don't believe you have the IQ of an apple.

Getting a TV camera working to capture the footage and transmit it back to earth was a challenge, but it wasn't exactly rocket science.

It never ceases to amaze me just how tiny minded moon landing deniers are. They're all "Oh yeah, what did the astronauts eat and drink on the moon? There are no McDonalds there!" 🙄

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Digital cameras were invented in 1969.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_camera

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Digital cameras were invented in 1969.

Yes. What's your point? They weren't using digital cameras, they were using TV cameras, which go back to the 1920s.

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't doubt that the moon landings were real, but if anything could make me want to believe they were fake, it's a "comedy" report from this smug little doughy bitch.

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Adam Ruins Everything one that is still gnawing at me...even more so with this environmental worry garb.....is the one about Car Dealerships.

I see big car dealerships with thousands of cars just sitting on their lot, concrete or gravel. These car dealerships are everywhere, there are so many of them. Those cars are just sitting there along with their huge plot of concrete or gravel, just absorbing heat, shining like the expensive diamond created by releasing massive tons of CO2.

The usage of car dealerships, their lots full of physical cars, and their common strategy of rotating those same cars all around the nation regularly, are probably the worse thing for Global Warming and CO2 production, that we could fix extremely easily. Just ban the car dealership!

In his episode, Adam suggests that, due to these wasteful dealership commonalities, that buying a new, more efficient car, such as a hybrid, is always worse for the environment, than running your old, inefficient vehicle, as long as feasibly possible.