all 5 comments

[–]xoenix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Since Covid that guy's been a massive source of misinformation.

I think he's got some neurological deficit from long covid.

[–]xoenix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ok

[–]topiary2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is exactly why they made it their mission to terrify people into avoiding as much sunlight as possible

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Our findings indicate that vitamin D supplementation has a protective effect against the incidence of COVID-19 in RCT studies (OR 0.403, 95% IC 0.218, 0.747)

That's a reduction in risk of 59.7%

in the incidence of COVID-19 in analytical studies (OR = 0.592, 95% IC 0.476–0.736)

That's a reduction in risk of 40.8%

and in ICU admission (OR 0.317, 95% IC 0.147–0.680)

That's a reduction in risk of 68.3%

I mean, vitamin D is essential to the working of the immune system, and most people with indoor jobs are insufficient, so you would expect there to be a benefit when fighting off infections to vitamin D supplementation, and these figures are significant.

The 80% is from the section not summarised in the abstract looking at healthcare workers only. One of the five studies comes up with a 97% reduction in risk, that brings that group up to about 80%.

That one paper didn't look at COVID-19 specifically. It looked at all influenza-like illnesses. Possibly COVID-19 remains more dangerous in even with sufficient Vitamin D than other influenza-like infections.