all 19 comments

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

Poetic justice! The same arguments feminists used, being used against them in a most magnificent way. Oh, this is so rare to see people get their comeuppance like this. More! More!

[–]bobbobbybob 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

It isn't feminist who are losing out. It is normal girls and women, and they don't deserve that shit. Ban the dudes already.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

But normal girls and women are going to see that feminists did this. It will be a wonderful red pill.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

But who is defining feminism? Wouldn't a feminist actually oppose this?

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Only TERFs. And TERFs are transphobic bigots. That's what makes the whole thing so hilarious! The exact same deliberately unfair standards they imposed on everyone else are being turned on them instead! It's beautiful!

[–]akkordeonplayer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So, you just hate women, then?

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good morning

[–]akkordeonplayer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No. A transhumanist lobby funded by tech billionaires pushed this, not women.

[–][deleted]  (11 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    Oh ho ho, that's biological essentialism, a discredited transphobic idea! Women can be anything they want! Biology is no limitation! You know who taught us this? Feminists! :D :D :D

    You dug your own grave. Now lie in it.

    [–]akkordeonplayer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    You want the US to become like Iran, right? Are you an incel?

    [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    That is a complete non sequitur argument. If you're not going to argue, I'm not going to, either.

    [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    The problem lies where biology doesn't give a shit about the rules or feelings set up by the higher or lower thinking creatures goverened by its rules. It's primary focus is the continuation of biological processes that include reproduction and evolution.

    Biology doesn't give a damn if women work. It only acknowledges that they're physiologically designed to be women, and physically weaker than men.

    The sexes work in tandem, and compliment one another. As far as higher processes that require thought, such as how we think in terms of healing eachother through medicine, or working a job in advertising, or querying a pool of data-- none of these things are biologically essential, but they are important for a functioning society. We all have roles, and our abilities to learn, understand and apply information have evolved over time. This means that we can acknowledge that women have the capability of performing work, similarly to the male counterparts.

    Is your problem more with the censorship promoted within some feminist communities or the process of women gaining rights along the same levels as men? You have a lot of posts that sometimes conflict on this, or at least that's my personal interpretation.

    [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

    Oh ho ho, now that is evolutionary psychology, another discredited MRA myth. It's surprising how many MRAs are showing up in these comments with their bankrupt ideas that were proven false long ago.

    [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Why is it considered an MRA myth? I don't understand why that would be associated with MRAs specifically.

    [–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Oh, OK. Evo-psych started well enough, but MRAs started using it to justify women's and men's roles in society, arguing for the usual bullshit that they spew. Shortly thereafter an avalanche of scholarship decisively refuted and then buried the concept. It's one of those things where mentioning it is enough to kill your academic career now. I'd advise staying far away from it, it's in the same realm as "13% of the people commit 50% of the crimes" bullshit.

    [–]Comatoast 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    So what were the funding sources for the majority of scholarly articles? Was there any bias or politics based agenda?

    What do those scholarly sources have to do with refuting physiology itself and physical abilities between sexes?

    [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    RACIST, SEXIST, ANTI-GAY

    MRA, GO AWAY!

    [–]SargentBlack 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    lgbt is a disease of the spirit for which there is no vaccine available. oh my gawd, that is why they want to vaccinate us. they want to turn us all into fags.