you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]skeeter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

For example, there is no evidence that the 8 million vote margin for Biden was developed fraudulently.

republicans were not allowed to be an active part of the ballot counting process. They were allowed to observe from dozens of feet away from the counting tables. They were sometimes not allowed to enter the building where the counting was being done.

But if you say that those votes were fraudulent, there is no reliable algorithm that can locate your comment and ban it.

There are artificial intelligence bots that can read text in any language from around the world and it knows what the fk you are talking about. In the earlier days of AI bots being released onto the forums, there were bots that would counsel suicidal persons in the /r/suicidewatch sub.

The democrats seem determined to accuse trumpers of orchestrating the jan six event, which they might get their insurrection after all..

Can you imagine having a few million people swarm the whitehouse? you cant shoot them all.

The trumpers were not behind the jan six event, because trump asked them to be peaceful.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

republicans were not allowed to be an active part of the ballot counting process. They were allowed to observe from dozens of feet away from the counting tables. They were sometimes not allowed to enter the building where the counting was being done.

This is a lie, and part of the disinformation spread by right-wing websites. It should be obvious. ALL voting districts were required to have a balance of Dem, Republican and potentially other parties present for the counting. That's obviously how they're managed. Some of those Repuglicans were also the ones who claimed that occasional batches of ballots were scanned twice. Do you think Red states like Georgia would have allowed ONLY Dems to count the votes? Nope. It's easy to debunk this.

There are artificial intelligence bots that can read text in any language from around the world and it knows what the fk you are talking about. In the earlier days of AI bots being released onto the forums, there were bots that would counsel suicidal persons in the /r/suicidewatch sub.

But they're not needed in order to hack voting machines, nor would they be as helpful as human intervention. Yes, hacking is possible and could have been arranged for some machines. The hacking of 8 million votes, however? Hacking would impact only a few thousand votes in some districts.

The democrats seem determined to accuse trumpers of orchestrating the jan six event, which they might get their insurrection after all.

If you didn't see the incitements to violence, you weren't watching the speeches and social media. It was so obvious that Trump was impeached for it, some of his supporters will serve jail sentences, and had they succeeded, it's known that Biden would not have been confirmed on 6 Jan. And by looking at these pathetic microdick gravy seals and their technical gear and the American flags they used to beat security officers, it's apparent that these cowards would fuck up an attempted insurrection (again).

Can you imagine having a few million people swarm the whitehouse? you cant shoot them all.

If you're referring to the QBoogalloo morons, those who would manage to get to D.C. would only be a in the thousands, at best, and their actions would unite the country against them. Moreover, Trump's appointees in the Pentagon might no longer be there to make sure that there would be no proper security at the capitol building.

The trumpers were not behind the jan six event, because trump asked them to be peaceful.

Again: this is a lie. The statements of Trump, Giuliani, others and on social media were explicitly calling for people to take back their house. And Trump said he'd join them, but did not, as was typical of everything he did: abuse and steal from the 99% for the sake of benefits for the 1%. That was his MO.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Elections were proven fraudulent in the 70's. Elections are rigged via for-profit corporations selecting candidates.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Which is why Dems ONLY win when they vote in great numbers. Repuglicans have wanted to stop this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This isn't true... My home county voted blue this past election even though their voter turnout was ridiculously low. Everyone thought it was strange, but due to the media being so dogged about there being no fraud, nothing was done. No investigation for our fair and balanced election, ha!