all 33 comments

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (24 children)

Is it that difficult to distinguish between disinformation and facts? (No.) She's referring to obvious lies.

[–]skeeter 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

what about the lie that the 2020 election was not the result of vote fraud?

freedom of speech is about my having the freedom to decide what i want to say and deciding what i want to listen to.

freedom of speech is NOT about my government deciding what i can or can not say.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

Her comments are mainly about companies and organizations that actively promote disinformation that they expect you so share. You still have your freedom of speech. For example, there is no evidence that the 8 million vote margin for Biden was developed fraudulently. But if you say that those votes were fraudulent, there is no reliable algorithm that can locate your comment and ban it. The algorithm would look for patterns that stem from the companies and organizations.

[–]skeeter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

For example, there is no evidence that the 8 million vote margin for Biden was developed fraudulently.

republicans were not allowed to be an active part of the ballot counting process. They were allowed to observe from dozens of feet away from the counting tables. They were sometimes not allowed to enter the building where the counting was being done.

But if you say that those votes were fraudulent, there is no reliable algorithm that can locate your comment and ban it.

There are artificial intelligence bots that can read text in any language from around the world and it knows what the fk you are talking about. In the earlier days of AI bots being released onto the forums, there were bots that would counsel suicidal persons in the /r/suicidewatch sub.

The democrats seem determined to accuse trumpers of orchestrating the jan six event, which they might get their insurrection after all..

Can you imagine having a few million people swarm the whitehouse? you cant shoot them all.

The trumpers were not behind the jan six event, because trump asked them to be peaceful.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

republicans were not allowed to be an active part of the ballot counting process. They were allowed to observe from dozens of feet away from the counting tables. They were sometimes not allowed to enter the building where the counting was being done.

This is a lie, and part of the disinformation spread by right-wing websites. It should be obvious. ALL voting districts were required to have a balance of Dem, Republican and potentially other parties present for the counting. That's obviously how they're managed. Some of those Repuglicans were also the ones who claimed that occasional batches of ballots were scanned twice. Do you think Red states like Georgia would have allowed ONLY Dems to count the votes? Nope. It's easy to debunk this.

There are artificial intelligence bots that can read text in any language from around the world and it knows what the fk you are talking about. In the earlier days of AI bots being released onto the forums, there were bots that would counsel suicidal persons in the /r/suicidewatch sub.

But they're not needed in order to hack voting machines, nor would they be as helpful as human intervention. Yes, hacking is possible and could have been arranged for some machines. The hacking of 8 million votes, however? Hacking would impact only a few thousand votes in some districts.

The democrats seem determined to accuse trumpers of orchestrating the jan six event, which they might get their insurrection after all.

If you didn't see the incitements to violence, you weren't watching the speeches and social media. It was so obvious that Trump was impeached for it, some of his supporters will serve jail sentences, and had they succeeded, it's known that Biden would not have been confirmed on 6 Jan. And by looking at these pathetic microdick gravy seals and their technical gear and the American flags they used to beat security officers, it's apparent that these cowards would fuck up an attempted insurrection (again).

Can you imagine having a few million people swarm the whitehouse? you cant shoot them all.

If you're referring to the QBoogalloo morons, those who would manage to get to D.C. would only be a in the thousands, at best, and their actions would unite the country against them. Moreover, Trump's appointees in the Pentagon might no longer be there to make sure that there would be no proper security at the capitol building.

The trumpers were not behind the jan six event, because trump asked them to be peaceful.

Again: this is a lie. The statements of Trump, Giuliani, others and on social media were explicitly calling for people to take back their house. And Trump said he'd join them, but did not, as was typical of everything he did: abuse and steal from the 99% for the sake of benefits for the 1%. That was his MO.

[–]skeeter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

elections are easy to steal, if you control the vote counting.

I am pretty sure the election was stolen, you say it wasnt.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

elections are easy to steal, if you control the vote counting.

Which is why all voting districts were required to have a balance of Dem, Republican and potentially other parties present for the counting.

I am pretty sure the election was stolen

Did you know that that claim is so specious that the "Kraken" lawyers are all getting sanctioned for wasting the courts' time?

They're going to have to pay the money that the taxpayer spent on the court cases, and they're all, or at very least, nearly all going to be disbarred.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/07/12/kraken-sanctions-hearing-lin-wood-blames-sidney-powell-in-attempt-to-evade-punishment-as-judge-expresses-skepticism/?sh=4ba6480b194a

So you can be pretty sure, if you like, but there's no room for anyone who is supposed to have looked at the evidence to come to that conclusion.

[–]skeeter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

i am pretty sure that the election was stolen.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If you had checked even cursorily the evidence for that, you would be dead certain that it wasn't.

Which is why Sidney Powell and her ilk will be sanctioned and disbarred.

A lawyer should have a look for some evidence before engaging a client. Before deciding that you're "pretty sure", you should too.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A lawyer would also charge a client out the wazoo, fuck off with your law bullshit. If laws are made by corrupt individuals, they are nothing more than barnyard rules. We can see this when the corrupted politicians don't go to jail for things a normal man would go to jail for. Biden should be in jail. Trump should be in jail.

The "authorized" authorities will not look into fraud and manipulation. Somewhere in their command chain is a group of shitheads who created the fraud and manipulation in the first place. You and socks are seriously the biggest bootlickers this site has seen.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Elections were proven fraudulent in the 70's. Elections are rigged via for-profit corporations selecting candidates.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Which is why Dems ONLY win when they vote in great numbers. Repuglicans have wanted to stop this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This isn't true... My home county voted blue this past election even though their voter turnout was ridiculously low. Everyone thought it was strange, but due to the media being so dogged about there being no fraud, nothing was done. No investigation for our fair and balanced election, ha!

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ufff the usefull idiot in you is strong.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You do realize she worked for an Israeli spy company, right?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No.

This is alleged.

Israelis and Israel companies should not be trusted, at all. So it's unfortunate that she worked for one of them. What she knows from these networks of Israelis probably helped her get her job. There are so many pro-Israel "spies" and lobbyists in D.C., that one reference to someone in contact with them is a drop in the ocean, so to speak. Psaki is very good at her job.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not alleged, she was. She is very pro-Israel too. I don't do identity politics so Psaki should be expelled due to her stance on Zionism.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Solid turnaround.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Odd. These companies an organizations who fund an support these disinformation campaigns are almost entirely made up of groups who identify with your left wing establishment views. Lol

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If you look at the owners and writers for many of the sites listed at /s/ShitpostNews, you'll see that they're mainly right wing, or alt-right. I would list them here, but they are already listed in thaat sub.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Surprise surprise, the leftist mostly finds shitty right-wing media.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unz review is an excellent site.

You link me a couple websites only known by a niche group of people. Why the left wing establishment dominates the world. Give me a fucking break.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Kinda like when I see its you posting im going to get all disinformation? Because if so I agree. It is easy to spot liars.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

15 comments

there doesn't seem to be anything here

Weird.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You've probably blocked the commenters. Socks and actuallynot are being twits, as usual.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

blocked users socks

He must have made the first comment, as I seem to recall checking a box to hide comment threads starting with a blocked user.

He's like the 2nd or 3rd user I've blocked since 2005.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't understand why the folks here entertain him.

He first got upset if anyone talked bad about Jews, now he talks about them as if he always saw their evil. He's a duplicitous cunt.

He also refers to me often in other posts, so that I'll come in guns blazing and so that he can undermine my own position with his moral grandstanding. I really don't understand how he's still here.

Admins need to be tough on obvious shills.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's probably the schizophrenic nature of his account. Sometimes it's like there's a real thinking person generating the comments. This sets up the 'intermittent reward' process that a consistent shill wouldn't see.

Other times it seems to be in full bot mode, and comes up with the most ludicrous claims. Most of the time he's clearly commenting and replying in bad faith, but his defense of "simply being retarded" is too plausible to ban him.

I finally blocked that account because those comments were so ridiculous that it was too tempting to reply.

Related topic: Have been having a rat problem in my back yard, and just trapped it under a bucket a few minutes ago. I put a rat trap out yesterday, with a chunk of cheese on the trigger, secured with twist ties this time. I think it gave the rat a concussion when it triggered, which is why it was just wandering around in the daylight. Just for the next few hours, I'm going to call it socks. lol

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

We're providing facts and reasonable comments.

You're merely attacking people, without any evidence, without resonable arguments, and insane paranoid schizo gems like this:

fuck off with your law bullshit.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've watched as lawmakers work hand in hand with real estate moguls to steal county elections.

And then you call me an insane paranoid schizo. I've seen corruption happen, I've watched it get reported, I watched as nothing happened. You don't get to call me a paranoid schizophrenic when you don't even have a clue as to how the political process actually works.

I've been hands on with our local politics, socks. Have you?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

call me a paranoid schizophrenic

I certainly did NOT do this. I said this about a COMMENT:

and insane paranoid schizo gems

[–]hookah21 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW WHO TO TRUST.