91 criminal charges

submitted by g0ldfish from (msn.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Name any of the charges brought by her office, or any of the other charges brought by other offices that is unfair or inappropriate.

  • Encouraging people to watch TV.
  • Reserving a room at the Georgia Capitol for a meeting.
  • Requesting signature verification. Asking for signatures to be verified, as required by law, is a criminal act now.
  • Asking for phone numbers.
  • Making phone calls.
  • Encouraging somebody to attend a hearing.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/how-stupid-is-the-georgia-anti-trump-case-they-indicted-trump-for-tweeting-at-people-to-watch-tv/

If Putin had charged one of his political enemies with an indictment like this, what would you think? This is Banana Republic third-world dictatorship shit.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Those are not the charges. Again, do you have any interest in the facts?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

They are literally items on the indictment. They are the facts.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

They are literally RELATED to the charges, but they are NOT the charges. He is NOT charged with any of those activities. They are not against the law. WTF is wrong with you, mate?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

What are you, a conspiracy theorist?

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I don't see how this comment is related to anything. The topic is: 91 criminal charges.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Every one of those so called "charges", as referenced by weavilsatemyface, are no more than day to day activities such as booking a room or watching TV, and each charge listed ends with "This was an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy". So, if you believe these are worthy charges, you are in agreement that there was a conspiracy. Therefore you are a conspiracy theorist since those charges have not been realised. It's also worth noting that the title of this post doesn't read '91 related things to some charges'.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Name one of them.

What we believe doesn't matter. Every charge has obviously been carefully researched. No one on Saidit will name one of the charges that he/she can claim is inappropriate or unfair. Generalizations won't do.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

On or about the 3rd day of December 2020, Donald John Trump caused to be tweeted from the Twitter account @RealDonaldTrump "Georgia hearings now on @OANN. Amazing!" This was an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.

This is fucking retarded.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's not one of the charges. It's a quote from Trump, of part of the evidence (NOTE your sources when you post a quote).

You seems to be interested in the Georgia state charges.

I'll help you understand them. Which of these 4 are 'retarded' and why?:

Violating Georgia's racketeering act: The indictment alleges that Mr Trump, "while associated with an enterprise, unlawfully conspired" through a pattern of fraudulent activity to change the outcome of the election. This falls under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (Rico) Act, which has been used to bring down mafia bosses like John Gotti

Solicitation of violation of oath by public officer: Mr Trump is facing three counts on this charge, including one related to a January 2021 phone call between Mr Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, during which prosecutors allege Mr Trump asked Mr Raffensperger to "unlawfully" alter or adjust the the certified returns for presidential electors

Conspiracy to impersonate a public officer: The indictment alleges Mr Trump unlawfully conspired to influence certain individuals to falsely act as elected officials "with intent to mislead"

Conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree: The charge alleges that Mr Trump intended to defraud the public by conspiring to make a false document titled "CERTIFICATE OF THE VOTES OF THE 2020 ELECTORS FROM GEORGIA", a document which would have made Mr Trump appear to be the winning candidate in Georgia

False statements and writings and filing false documents: The purpose of the false statements, of which there are several listed, was to persuade Georgia legislators to "reject lawful" votes cast by duly elected officials, the indictment alleges

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66503668