you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dune1032 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The Democrats are foolish to have an old man with low approval ratings as their presidential nominee. To make matters worse Harris doesn't appear to be very smart. That's sad since she is not only the first woman VP but is mixed Black and Indian. The Democrats would be smart to start looking for another ticket.

[–]LabTech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

That they didn't means they CAN'T: Biden/Harris is clearly the best they can do, because they'd never willingly allow a guy this obviously compromised mentally if there were better options.

[–]Dune1032 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Perhaps Democrats feel it is only proper to have the incumbent President be the party's presidential nominee. Forget propriety. There is too much at state. Democratic leaders should tell Biden that with his low approval, he cannot win. Does he want Trump to be President? They will search for a stronger ticket.

[–]LabTech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Please, Pelosi said it best when she said that the way they operate, they could run a glass of water for office and have it win just so long as they put a big D next to its name. Democrats don't operate on merit, they operate on brand loyalty, or failing that, fear of any alternative. Plus, let's be real, they've become dependent on voter fraud, even though in certain circles just mentioning the possibility of it will get you cancelled. Biden would never be President if they hadn't 'coincidentally' found enough boxes of pre-filled ballots at 3am in all the right precincts. They got Fetterman into office when he demonstrably had brain damage from a stroke, then kept him in office when he disappeared for weeks due to clinical depression; obviously, they have no problem running potatoes for office, given they're even keeping Feinstein in office.

[–]Dune1032 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Here is a link to an article saying that Democratic leaders are feeling anxiety about Biden running for President and provides a list of possible replacements for Biden. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-05-20/democrats-candidates-joe-biden-2024-campaign

If Democrats want to win, they should begin talking to these potential replacements.

[–]LabTech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thing is though, even if they can find another warm body that technically, if we squint sideways hard enough, qualifies for the post: are they realistically any more marketable than Biden? I mean, let's look past the fact that the LA Times leans left, and thus is going to fluff the Democratic candidates up; don't you think the fact that THIS early in the game the DNC has declared there'll be no nominational debates indicate pretty clearly that the fix is already in, and if not the rivals will be told to fold early so as to not divide the party? No disrespect, I agree 110% on your general thrust, but at this point I think it's pretty clear that word's gone out that Biden's a lock.

I say this as someone who used to vote Democrat until 2016, and while the Democratic party's been dead to me for the last 5-6 years, still hopes that eventually they purge the old blood, burn the corpse, and let something newer and nobler take its pace.

I mean, let's just go through the list of what this left-leaning outlet thinks their favored sons and daughters are:

Moore and Shapiro: unknowns outside their state; will take years at best to build up a body of policies and results to build a reputation on that will give them the cache. Same as how DeSantis IMHO still needs a couple years to build his portfolio up, and he's being premature now. Maybe they'll work out, but not this cycle... assuming there's nothing in their past that'll ruin them, or they don't get caught up in a scandal.

Gretchen Whitmer: Call me crazy, but I think conspiring with the Feds on a kidnapping plot where only one of the kidnappers wasn't a Fed or an informant, in order to make herself seem like a victim to pump her numbers... not the kind of person who should be President. Also, she was one of the worst tyrants during the COVID years... and a complete hypocrite on her own lockdown policies.

Roy Cooper: Seems like a comparatively decent guy on a casual scan, although I don't know much about him; he does seem hamstrung by the fact that he seems to tow the party line on a number of the more unpleasant platform positions of the mainline Democratic party, even declaring a state of emergency over the school choice issue. If he were to raise higher than Governor, he'd have to grow a spine to stand against that and reform the party, and the DNC would make sure any spine he grew would meet the business end of a crowbar. He'd be like Bernie Sanders: warm and affectionate like a grampa, but weak politically and easily broken to the interests of the higher players.

Pritzker and Murphy: Elitists who were born with a gold spoon in their mouths, have no understanding of the common man's struggles, and would have no problem enacting the worst of the Elite globalist agenda, because to them voting is an inconvenience they tolerate because us 'peasants' haven't yet been properly brought to heel. What's not bolted down they'll steal; everything else they'll get in the form of bribes.

Beshear: A very blue person in a very red state who JUST squeaked by in the polls; probably more on the name recognition of his father who'd been governor before him. So far, the track record of his policies make him just another carbon-copy Democrat who pretends to be conservative because he's in a red state, but will show their true colors on the national stage.

Gavin Newsom: Do I really need to point out how badly California's doing right now? He's certainly tanned and coifed enough to look Presidential, and I'm sure Aunt Pelosi will put in a good word, but I'd really rather not have to avoid shit, needles, and homeless encampments during my daily walks.

There's more down the list, but even the article puts them at the bottom of the barrel for good reason: people like Klobuchar, Booker, and Buttigieg stand no chance for the same reason they stood no chance the last time: everyone sees them for what they are, and what they are is nothing to vote for.

As I said, little wonder they're going to see if they can pump Mr. Magoo full of enough adrenochrome, pray to Moloch, and offer up some child sacrifices to make sure he makes it to 86; which is statistically impossible given his age, as well as his dreadful health both physically and mentally.

[–]Dune1032 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Moore, Shapiro, Whitmer, and Cooper all won in swing states. This means they appeal to voters outside of the Democratic Party. Pritzker and Murphy are businessmen and consequently, will have policies that favor businesses.

[–]LabTech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're not picking up what I'm putting down: that doesn't mean jack if the DNC has made it clear that Biden's the choice; you don't think them calling a lid on any notion of a debate isn't indicative? If the Democrats felt ANY of those people were fit to fill the office, we'd have already heard tons of puff pieces about them, and we'd be bandying their names about in discussion already... instead all we hear are the crickets singing inside Biden's ears. Sanders and Gabbard are proof that the party doesn't want reformers, so anyone that would actually be marketable across the aisles is doomed.

Yeah, those people won in swing states: all that proves is the voter fraud is very effective, especially when most states are red aside from deep blue enclaves that hold enough districts to give Dems a better-than-average shot. Don't ever confuse electoral victory with agreement with the policies that will be enacted.