you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I think it is pushed by intelligence to create a controlled opposition. Maybe with support by the Democrats themselves. Nothing makes the opposition worse, than have this weird theory about Obama's wife being male. It puts the opposition right in the trash.

The real problem of Obama is that he was a puppet for the billionaires, supported wars and pushed the climate scare agenda.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Pushed by intelligence"

No, the conspiracy theorists aren't wrong about our imaginary enemies! Don't say that! Don't say that we have ridiculously low standards of proof, when a statement aligns to our fake worldview!

Instead, what's happening here is that the conspiracist's enemies are creating fake theories about themselves, which we conspiracists are accidentally spreading, because we have absolutely zero standards of evidence for statements which align to our fake worldview!! Nnnnnggghhhh

[–]zyxzevn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Yes. Intelligence are "imaginary". I go back to sheep.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right. The intelligence agencies are real.

And they put out fake conspiracy theories, including about themselves, which conspiracy theorists accidentally spread and propagate.

Not normal people, though. Normal people don't spread and propagate the fake information, which the CIA put out, about the former first lady. Only conspiracists. Why?

Why are the conspiracist's imaginary enemies, so capable of playing the conspiracist like a fiddle? It's inexplicable. A paradox.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The more you post these incoherent psychotic words salads in defense of the oligarchy, the more you prove, they have something to hide.

[–]dicknipples 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You could apply both arguments to any politician. Rather than suggest that a post at Rumble (Rumble!) is somehow promoting the Obamas by attacking them in one of the cheapest possible ways, you could see this as a Rumble user acting exactly like a Rumble user (eg. with the maturity of a 12-year-old autistic rapist).

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rumble is great. Youtube is sadly complete garbage and propaganda. Like reddit, mr Dick Nipples.