all 32 comments

[–]aaarrgh 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

they are too stupid to understand that THEY are the real fascists. A remarkable fail in self-awareness

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]VraiBleu 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Couldn’t have said it better.

    [–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I came here to say this.

    [–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh yeah,declaring war on half of europe was totally trying to resist global jewry/international finance.

    [–]VraiBleu 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    Trying to silence speech is not fighting Fascism, it IS fascism!

    Cringe comment. Firstly the left are not ‘thu real fascists’, they’re communists. Call them what they really are. Secondly Fascism is not against free speech, just corporate subversion of the media by the elites like we see today.

    Source: am actually a fascist

    [–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Nah, most of them aren't communists. It's a misnomer. There are many kinds of leftists and only a few of them are commies. All of them resemble fascists far more than they would ever admit though. They even use the same tactics of brownshirts and breaking up enemy speeches.

    [–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    The Brownshirts were established to defend nsdap marches against communist aggression, just like how the proud boys defend against anti-fa today.

    [–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Say, are Antifa communists? Speak freely and let us know how knowledgeable you are.

    [–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Communists & anarchists, yes.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Lmao, they are terrible anarchists. A real anarchist would not physically attack people protesting the state using undemocratic emergency powers to force people to undergo an untested medical procedure. Nor would a real anarchist insist that speech like using the wrong pronouns is literal violence and needs to be censored. They haven't the faintest understanding of the principles of anarchism, and they are a fucking disgrace to the ideology.

    [–]VraiBleu 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Fair enough mate, no doubt they are massive hypocrites as well as being anti-white racists. I’m just telling you what they call themselves

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I’m just telling you what they call themselves

    Yeah they sure do, sorry didn't mean to go off on you there. I've considered myself somewhere in that ideological neighborhood, and feel a bit betrayed by these people

    [–]VraiBleu 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    No worries man. As someone in the Nationalist / so called ‘far right’ ideological camp I know what it feels like to be betrayed by your leaders. Corruption & hypocrisy seems to be a universal thing…

    [–]WhenImBanned 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Leftists have dug themselves into a hole. Their biggest 2 downfalls are transing the kids and Biden being a vegetable. If the left wins, you know they be cheating. I wonder what the ((powers that be)) will do knowing if Republicans win, they won't care about Ukraine.

    [–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

    Fascism only silences "communications", that is, statements and yes, "speech" that seeks to destroy the sound foundation of a civilized society. The "silencing of speech" for which the nazis were the most famous for was burning books. What was omitted in this "historical account of Nazi actions" was that these books were OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.

    So if for example, Drag Queen Story Hour were opposed by organizations, you might be able to call them FASCIST. Fascism is actual, politically actioned, virtue. Marxism is the contrary: fake virtue for the sake of appearing nice while in fact being a heinous destroyer of what is good and wholesome.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

    What was omitted in this "historical account of Nazi actions" was that these books were OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.

    Yes...child pornography like... Ernest Hemingway's For Whom the Bell Tolls, John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath, Karl Marx's Das Kapital, and Tolkiens The Hobbit

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_authors_banned_in_Nazi_Germany

    [–]Alphix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    LOL @ using wikipedia as a source. ESPECIALLY as a source of information about nazi doings in WW2. I wonder if it's an IQ problem or one of gullibility? Maybe you are just intentionally doing this? Either way, it doesn't look good.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Are you saying the source is inaccurate? You included no sources at all for your claim. Nazi censorship of ideas opposed to their own is quite well documented, as is the propaganda of Goebbels. What is your evidence that nothing that wasnt child porn was banned?

    It sounds like this list was published by Reich Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, and they published a similar list in Nazi occupied Poland

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Here's an official list of books banned from libraries by the Nazi's, the guardian isn't the original source, just writing about it. Still waiting for your evidence

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/01/german-index-nazi-official-list-of-banned-books-1933

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    Heres some video of a University book burning of anything 'non-german'

    https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/book-burning

    “Yes to decency and morality in family and state! I consign to the flames the writings of Heinrich Mann, Ernst Gläser, Erich Kästner.”

    Goebbels being quoted calling for burning of writings

    [–]Alphix 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Those university book burnings burnt books that were never ordained by the party, though. The doings of a few people affiliated to a movement don't define the movement. Again... IQ or intentional derailing, or what?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    The Goebbels quote calling for the burnings isnt good enough?

    I'm still waiting on your evidence, you are the one making a claim contrary to common knowledge, that the Nazi's did not do censorship, only banned child porn.

    For example, when Hibiki refutes the holocaust common knowledge of 6 million dead jews, he provides rather compelling evidence that this number is incorrect. He also doesn't make fucking idiotic claims like '6 million jews is a lie, therefore the number was zero', which is essentially the case you are making with regards to nazi censorship, except you have shown literally zero support for your claim

    So again, do you have ANY evidence to support this claim, or does it exist purely in your mind

    [–]Alphix 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    You argue in ill faith, therefore I am wholly unmotivated to dig up things to satisfy you. It will amount to nothing, given your bad faith. So I'll let your disingenuous deforming of my words stay as is without further loss of energy on my part.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Here is a video that shows Jewish people in the Treblinka death camp.

    All praise to G-d.

    Shalom.

    https://youtu.be/5Brj57wVNnU

    [–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    OK and? I don't know these authors, but obviously it was done in the name of decency and morality, so what's the problem? Does it offend your particular degeneracy?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    You were claiming they only banned child pornography, I am saying that doesn't seem to be the case

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Predators exist and they prey on children.

    [–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I never wrote "only". They had perfectly good reasons to ban those few other writings as well.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Report them to the proper authorities then, saidit isn't the FBI. I am not clicking any of your child trafficking or masturbating tranny links

      [–]mousetrap 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      my point is that if I showed you where children are being held and sold, you don't care at all.

      this is true for 99.99% of people

      you only care about you

      [–]LabTech 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Dollars to donuts says the green-haired screecher is an avid fan of Vaush, because he's one of the bigger names of the breadtube leftist scene, and he uses the phrase 'stochastic terrorism' often, despite ironically BEING a stochastic terrorist himself.