you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Psychosomatic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What you are succeeding in, is dissecting a generalisation to its finer details of subcultures when it was unnecessary. We could discuss my specific regional history and how it relates to me, but that wasn't my point. You can be proud to be who you are no matter which subculture you belong to.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We could discuss my specific regional history

The point of this thread and the op image is that you don't have a regional history.

You have a white history and that's it. Nobody is British, nobody is Irish, nobody is French - they are just white. Any difference between Brit and French is erased: you are just white, you are not white British. By claiming that Britishness exists, you're eliminating the singular property of whiteness. No - you aren't British with a regional history - you are solely white, exactly the same as Germans and Albanians and so on.

I am arguing against that. I have said over and over again that whiteness does not exist, but ethnicities do. I agree that you might be overwhelmingly some British ethnicity with a regional history. That has been my point the whole thread. Glad you are agreeing with me.

[–]Psychosomatic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🍻