Identity
submitted 1 year ago by Tarrock from (media.communities.win)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Psychosomatic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Pretty sure charmander is different to clafairy bro.
[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
Right - charmander is a flying and fire type. It's an evolution of another Pokémon. Charmander and clefairy cannot breed and have viable offspring.
Humans do not have types. Humans are all the same species. Humans have viable (fertile) babies.
The way racists talk about whiteness and blackness is akin to Pokémon.
"This Pokémon likes gugu berries" -> "This race likes chicken"
"This Pokémon evolved to fly" -> "This race evolved to steal"
"This Pokémon is number 146 in the Pokédex" -> "This race is number four of five possible races"
People aren't Pokémon. You can't talk like that about people. Racists try to, but it just doesn't work, because humans are a continuity and pokemon are discreet
[–]Psychosomatic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
I disagree. There are types.
There are cool types, such as me.
And then there is you...The uncool. You are clafairy to me
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
It's All Politics
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Psychosomatic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Psychosomatic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)