you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]madcow-5 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Also wondering. It doesn’t match common sense IMO, and the image is low quality potentially hiding give-aways, but anyone trying to sport graphic tech skills is full of shit.

I’ve worked with photoshop professionally for about 15 years. Including image editing jobs specifically. I’m not seeing give-aways.

[–]whistlepig 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

25 years here.. and I agree. the lighting is dead on.

but maybe it was gimped ;]

[–]jet199[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

At least the "nothing ever happens" crowd here isn't as bad as reddit. They only pipe up over their own personal hobby horses and not every single goddam post like the other place.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not seeing give-aways either. The focus, specular, and shading seem legit. That's where amateurs go wrong. If fake it's pro.

I still have my first PhotoShoped image from 1993. I scanned my girlfriend's photo, did some basic designs to it, and B&W laser printed it at the University Of Windsor. High-tech back then.