you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

A mountain of evidence, proving a crime beyond doubt, means a whole lot of nothing if there is no judge willing to hear the case, assess it, and make an unbiased ruling. The old saying '"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" applies here. If laws or regulations are broken, but no court is willing to enforce them, do they really still exist beyond empty words on paper?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Okay. Let's say they were brilliant enough to steal the election without leaving much evidence of cheating. How are they so brilliant as to add votes to Joe Biden, but not cheat on the behalf of the down ballot candidates they also needed? A simpler explanation is that Trump is a sore loser with cult followers. Occam's Razor mother fuckers!

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Let's say they were brilliant enough to steal the election without leaving much evidence of cheating.

They were not, there's is plenty of evidence. The courts refused to look at it

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

If the evidence is strong, you can prove it. People will got to prison. But when that doesn't happen, you will not admit you were wrong.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

IN this case, the chance to 'prove' required a court to sit. Qualified people to assess the validity of proffered evidence.

That opportunity was denied so all we have left is internet shouting. No matter what evidence I present, you'll just shout that it isn't valid. So what is the point? Instead, we are planning.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You can't accuse someone of a crime and not have any evidence. All you have is Mellissa Carone. A drunk convict who shut the fuck up when she was called out on her bullshit.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

There is plenty of evidence. No court would look at it. Videos, sworn statements, emails, statistics, records of the results over time, etc. etc.

The entire thing was a psyop, imo, to completely and utrterly demoralise. It was not enough to win, but the win had to be so blatantly false as to a) ensure that the mindfuk 1984 style doublespeak programs are well established in proles like yourself. "black is white', 'slavery is freedom', etc. and b) ensure that the non-compliant proles feel so isolated, have been so gaslighted, that they are never able to mount a response again. No more Trumps, ever. From now on the puppet show will be uninterrupted.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes. And just look at this poor brainwashed child. What is he even thinking? 😁

Hello love. And how have you been?

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So the vote turned out to be better for Trump than the polling indicated, yet it is still impossible that "grab them by the pussy" lost? A quarter of a million people died and he deserved to be president? Nobody ever had economy crash like that then get reelected. Dude! Everybody with some goddamn sense was sick of your dear leader.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everybody with some goddamn sense was sick of your dear leader.

Everyone glued to the teat of MSM was sick of Trump

The rest of us were sick of the unending bs from the left.

So the vote turned out to be better for Trump than the polling indicated,

a small margin win vs an actual +20m landslide. yep, it turned out better

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Firstly, there was plenty of evidence, just no judges from the lowest courts to the SCOTUS willing to hear the cases, nor examine the evidence. Secondly, there were in place quite enough regulations to have prevented the ballot fraud, but obviously no one willing to enforce them. You see my silly leftist, laws and regulations are just words on paper if no one upholds them. And just as in the democrats stealing many elections in 2016, none of those cases were taken, evidence weighed, and election results reversed....so basically 2016 was just a trial run for 2020. The DNC has hit upon a winning strategy. Pack the courts with their allies to insure that any missteps in the ballot fraud process gets swept under the rug.

As for not cheating "on the behalf of the down ballot candidates they also needed", did they really need them that bad? With the furor over the cheating they did do, was the marginal benefit worth the increased risk? The DNC has everything it wanted. Trump gone. Four years to flood the country with illegals (er, I mean newly minted democracts), gut the 1st & 2nd Amendments, begin the conversion to commification, eliminate any pesky regulations that stand in the way, and streamline the ballot fraud methodology to make it even easier (and less detectable) in 2024. Oh yeah, and get their long delayed and much beloved first female president...hell, they might even get Killary into the vacated VP seat....and eventually shoehorn her into the presidency. All it takes is for an old coot to get declared incompetent, or Clintoncided, and “The game is afoot".

[–]scrubking[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everyone thought trump and mitch had been packing the courts with conservatives, but the truth is that mitch was packing the courts with uniparty loyalists.