all 27 comments

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

A mountain of evidence, proving a crime beyond doubt, means a whole lot of nothing if there is no judge willing to hear the case, assess it, and make an unbiased ruling. The old saying '"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" applies here. If laws or regulations are broken, but no court is willing to enforce them, do they really still exist beyond empty words on paper?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Okay. Let's say they were brilliant enough to steal the election without leaving much evidence of cheating. How are they so brilliant as to add votes to Joe Biden, but not cheat on the behalf of the down ballot candidates they also needed? A simpler explanation is that Trump is a sore loser with cult followers. Occam's Razor mother fuckers!

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Let's say they were brilliant enough to steal the election without leaving much evidence of cheating.

They were not, there's is plenty of evidence. The courts refused to look at it

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

If the evidence is strong, you can prove it. People will got to prison. But when that doesn't happen, you will not admit you were wrong.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

IN this case, the chance to 'prove' required a court to sit. Qualified people to assess the validity of proffered evidence.

That opportunity was denied so all we have left is internet shouting. No matter what evidence I present, you'll just shout that it isn't valid. So what is the point? Instead, we are planning.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You can't accuse someone of a crime and not have any evidence. All you have is Mellissa Carone. A drunk convict who shut the fuck up when she was called out on her bullshit.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

There is plenty of evidence. No court would look at it. Videos, sworn statements, emails, statistics, records of the results over time, etc. etc.

The entire thing was a psyop, imo, to completely and utrterly demoralise. It was not enough to win, but the win had to be so blatantly false as to a) ensure that the mindfuk 1984 style doublespeak programs are well established in proles like yourself. "black is white', 'slavery is freedom', etc. and b) ensure that the non-compliant proles feel so isolated, have been so gaslighted, that they are never able to mount a response again. No more Trumps, ever. From now on the puppet show will be uninterrupted.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes. And just look at this poor brainwashed child. What is he even thinking? 😁

Hello love. And how have you been?

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So the vote turned out to be better for Trump than the polling indicated, yet it is still impossible that "grab them by the pussy" lost? A quarter of a million people died and he deserved to be president? Nobody ever had economy crash like that then get reelected. Dude! Everybody with some goddamn sense was sick of your dear leader.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everybody with some goddamn sense was sick of your dear leader.

Everyone glued to the teat of MSM was sick of Trump

The rest of us were sick of the unending bs from the left.

So the vote turned out to be better for Trump than the polling indicated,

a small margin win vs an actual +20m landslide. yep, it turned out better

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Firstly, there was plenty of evidence, just no judges from the lowest courts to the SCOTUS willing to hear the cases, nor examine the evidence. Secondly, there were in place quite enough regulations to have prevented the ballot fraud, but obviously no one willing to enforce them. You see my silly leftist, laws and regulations are just words on paper if no one upholds them. And just as in the democrats stealing many elections in 2016, none of those cases were taken, evidence weighed, and election results reversed....so basically 2016 was just a trial run for 2020. The DNC has hit upon a winning strategy. Pack the courts with their allies to insure that any missteps in the ballot fraud process gets swept under the rug.

As for not cheating "on the behalf of the down ballot candidates they also needed", did they really need them that bad? With the furor over the cheating they did do, was the marginal benefit worth the increased risk? The DNC has everything it wanted. Trump gone. Four years to flood the country with illegals (er, I mean newly minted democracts), gut the 1st & 2nd Amendments, begin the conversion to commification, eliminate any pesky regulations that stand in the way, and streamline the ballot fraud methodology to make it even easier (and less detectable) in 2024. Oh yeah, and get their long delayed and much beloved first female president...hell, they might even get Killary into the vacated VP seat....and eventually shoehorn her into the presidency. All it takes is for an old coot to get declared incompetent, or Clintoncided, and “The game is afoot".

[–]scrubking[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Everyone thought trump and mitch had been packing the courts with conservatives, but the truth is that mitch was packing the courts with uniparty loyalists.

[–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

i like the way the anchor handled her 'opinion'

that is how it should be.

acknowledgement of Truth, whatever it is.

doesn't mean it is the whole truth (even if you think it is)

the anchor should remain neutral as possible.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like how flat earth is an opinion?

[–]scrubking[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually he was dismissing what she said and being a dick in a 'nice' way.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

it was the economy, it was hot trash, now you can blame dem governors or china but how about doing something about it? Trump sat and did nothing for months, then when he realized he was about to lose he called for $2k stimulus checks, way too late and Mitch didn't allow it for some reason . . . so that's why Trump got blown out of the water.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

That and getting hundreds of thousands to die from covid. Trump was a selfish president. He should have lost bigger than he did.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

there probably was some election fraud, just to help repubs. The rich are never going to try to help dems win an election over repubs. I know the media pretended to hate Trump, they just liked the ratings.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Election fraud is real. It is somewhat rare. And it probably didn't change the outcome of any 2020 election.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

maybe

I kind of appreciate that trump tried to fight it, he had no evidence but he did try to legally object to fraud

I wish dems would demand recounts sometimes. Now tho the narrative will be that you never should, because orange man bad did.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When Al Gore challenged the votes in a single state, which was way closer than anything Trump had, the leaders who currently say 2020 was fishy, said Al Gore was a sore loser. Maybe you don't have the hypocrisy. But the conservative movement has hypocrisy as one of its cornerstones.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yep the hypocrisy knows no bounds

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He should have lost bigger than he did.

I'm not sure he would have lost at all if he didn't effectively tell his supporters not to vote.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trump's voters voted. Some of them even committed voter fraud. The 2020 problem was not voter suppression of white voters.