Thanks for information. It will take some while to dig through them.

But have you seen the fake science reports earlier?
Fake data or bad timing or bad samples, etc.
That is what I had collected a month earlier. If any of these reports are more than 1 to 2 months old, I am certain it was already mentioned in one of the videos of the Peak Prosperity Channel. And can be added to the fakes.

In practice there are very very good reports by doctors in the field. With very large groups of patients. And new good reports keep coming. This is great, because this is often MORE accurate than the what the scientists can produce. As the scientists often do not have the same contact with the patients, nor do they see how the disease develops. They have to dumb all the data down to a few numbers that may tell how they work. That is before any bias come in. Science only works when scientists are working together with the doctors in the field, otherwise it is just theoretical garbage science.

But there is a real push against HCQ that keeps going on. Based on all the reports that were already known to me. This made me very sceptical of the scientists claiming that it does not work. Especially with the 98% success rate reported by doctors.

To bring good science back into the successful work by the doctors, the scientists have to explain WHY their results are so good. After all the reported successes, claiming that HCQ does not do anything is not enough! Did they use the exact same treatment? Maybe they need to use Zinc? Did they use HCQ too late? Did they have patients on ventilators? How was tested for Covid-19 and how accurate was the diagnose? What was the null-group and how well did it get treated? What is the exact difference? How did they compare with each other?

Because there is no Zinc mentioned, it seems that they were setup to fail. And because billions are involved, and some scientists are just working for their companies, it is easy to understand why such tests were setup to fail.

So I start with the claim that ALL the above reports are FRAUDS. Many will using the common tactic of P-hacking as was used to promote Remdesevir. But in some occasions there will be just fake data as in the Lancet report and more and more.

Not denying the important of science, but it is actually very common and also normal that fake reports get published in Science and Nature, pushed by powerful companies. These companies pay the scientists and the journals to do that. It is not science but marketing for them.

But again, do not see this as a personal attack.
Thanks for posting the reports. And I want to see good science and not the corruption that I have seen until now.

I will see if I can find counter reports, but that will take a while..

Quick addition: I see that some studies have more deaths with HCQ than the control group.
This can only be achieved with malpractice or very bad science.
Either they have selected a group that was close to dying, which happened in one science study.
Or they have overdosed the patients with too much HCQ, which happened in more recent science study.
So clearly these science studies are FAKE science.