Twitter Bans QAnon But Discussions on “Attraction Towards Minors” Are Permitted

submitted by scrubking from (thegatewaypundit.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In the case of minors, it's not "fucked," which implies consent, but RAPED. Please don't use the casual "having sex" or "fucking" when we're talking about RAPING BABIES.

[–]NiceDickBro 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. In the same vein it’s while I’m against the term child porn, it’s not porn, it’s sexual abuse material.

[–]cybitch 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know, I was approaching this from the general POV of what videos of any animal of any age having sex/being raped have to do with "free speech". Everyone is already aware that stuff goes on, noone is trying to silence the truth on it and there are already tons of other places you can go see it.