all 17 comments

[–]d3rr 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

He also considers GPS trackers on cars not a search, and is okay with warrantless metadata collection. Will the real conservatives please stand up.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

He’s a piece of crap but I felt sort of bad for him.

[–]allie[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I thought he was a very bad actor and a very unpleasant, malevolent person. Before his performance in front of the judicial committee I had a bad opinion of some of his actions which I felt should disqualify him from being a judge. Afterwards I had a bad opinion of him as a person. He seems an out of control privileged asshole. A thoroughly evil person. I wouldn't want to be in the same room with him.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Might of been, but the women also looked like she was lying through her teeth. This whole event might be contrived. Maybe it is a psyop to desensitive people to accusations, blame, and moral truth. Demoralization has been a strategy by the elites for quite some time. What better way for a portion of the population to throw out the idea of due process. I think he will get in anyway, which is unfortunate because he voted for the NDAA and supported smith mundt act.

[–]allie[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Not the view of most people.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think almost everything nowadays both on the left and right is political theater designed to demoralize the population. Almsot everythign we see on the television or hear on national news is a PSYOP. The #metoo movement is just another psyop as well.

[–]TheGreatRoh 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mate he should be not confirmed because of this not because of allegations. Having him MeTooed without any evidence opens up a new Pandora’s box.

[–]useless_aether 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

good to know. i had no idea..

[–]MobiusRacetrack 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Obama thought the same

[–]allie[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then they were both wrong.

[–]crypt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Was from Yale and was on an approved judge list by bush himself.

[–]allie[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not surprised.

And he married Bush's secretary.

[–]MortonLoothorKodos 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Is Kavanaugh working with the government??

[–]allie[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He's part of the government. He worked with the Bush administration to justify torture. Worked with Ken Starr to try to use a fling to impeach Clinton. The more I research him the more he appalls me.

[–]expat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"a fling": Christ, you have A LOT to learn, kiddo. Kind of explains your posts, too. Pro-tip: do your research before posting, and don't use google ( is an alternative).

[–]allie[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mostly use duckduckgo though I don't trust it much either. I haven't found a search engine that doesn't censor its results. Not even Yandex and Baidu. Globally all the search engines are censored. It's a matter of degree.

[–]expat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Kav once ruled": if you don't like the law, then vote in those who change them to your liking, don't blame a judge for applying the law. It's his job, and the more he adheres to the law, the better a judge he is. If you had pulled up the case and argued, in legal terms, that he had made a faulty ruling, then you'd have something against him. As it stands, you have NOTHING but slander.

History repeats itself. Some, including op, obviously never learn: