you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

This claim that if you disagree with the lock down then you must think a virus isn't real is pure propaganda. The flu is real, it does not justify the lockdown. It was reasonable when there was less information and we didn't know how deadly it is, and had no treatment. Now we know that it is very mild and we have hydroxychloroquine. The very fact that the media is demonizing the best treatment we have proves that the people in control are only interested in growing their power, and are literally willing to kill for it.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That person you were responding to got scared and deleted acct. Guess they got freaked but it was fun to respond to them lmao.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nah, I think the admins removed their comments, as they obviously had an agenda (whether that was just causing chaos or not, who knows?). Their account is still up.

https://saidit.net/user/candyboxradio

If you check the top of this thread and click "other discussions", you'll see another poster re-posted this to /s/WorldPolitics as well. This video got attacked there too, and the admins removed comments there as well (check the /s/worldpolitics modlog, 4th one down)

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Right. It was an interesting conversation with that person though, they were talking about an islamic conspiracy to take over the world but upon agreeing with them; they would talk about the better side of islam and that non believers shall burn in hell.

Kinda wtf? Was the person against it or for it lol? Ohh well, its the internet and clownworld. I'll probably delete my account soon because it gets tedious to hold on to it and keep checking msgs etc. etc.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Canbot 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Well as a man I am going to decide if what my local, state and federal law enforcement agencies are doing is right or wrong and go from there. I would rather die than be the absolute door mat that you are.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    As a law abiding citizen, i am going to respect the decisions of my local and state and federal law enforcement agencies.

    this kind of thing is way above my pay grade.

    LMAO. Holy shit.

    I hope this comment is satire. Thinking for yourself is above your pay grade? You're so, so fucked.

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      If that truly is the case and you've been fucking with people throughout this entire thread for laughs, I can respect that effort.

      "he is also encouraging you to spill blood in the streets.

      giddy up."

      But you completely twisting his words, as well as putting words in his mouth that he never said, insinuating this video is a call to violence when it is the furthest thing from that (and as shown by all of your comments in this thread, including the ones following this one, you have no evidence or reason to support your belief that it is a "deep, subtle, call to violence" - you can't even explain yourself), is suspect as fuck. That's the exact opposite message of this video; he wants to prevent violence and bring the police force and civilians together again, as it should be. He believes that starts with police putting their foot down and refusing to enforce laws (or non-laws) that violate the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Simply saying "no", even if it costs them their jobs, as he did, as there are always more jobs and a paycheck is not worth ruining society or causing unnecessary violence over.

      Regardless of whether you are joking or not, violence isn't something one "jokes about".

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        the man in the video is deceiving you, in a very subtle way.

        Please, elaborate on your claim. I am open-minded.

        The whole entire video he contentiously says if police continue to enforce the (non-existent) laws they are, that violate people's freedoms/the Bill of Rights, it will take society down a path of violence. He's explaining to them why the path they're on is wrong using the Bill of Rights and Constitution as his source (and to be honest, we can already see signs of unrest that go unreported or are blackout'd by the MSM, but are reported by local or alternative media.. There have been many protests due to unfair and unreasonable/unnecessary arrests, as well as the enforcement of non-existant laws that violate people's liberties secured by the Bill of Rights/Constitution, that the media will not report on. People have protested and gathered outside of officer's houses..).

        This is the exact opposite of what he wants, and he says if police continue on the path they're on, what we're seeing now will only get worse, both in terms of society's anger, and in terms of the stripping of our liberty and freedoms.

        I, along with the majority of people on YouTube, aren't even the target demographic for this video; he is speaking to fellow cops, not to civilians. This video and message were originally meant for fellow LEOs in the US, not for civilians; it has since been reuploaded and spread.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          in the video, he sounds like he is warning you about what is happening

          Again, the video is meant for fellow police officers - it's a monologue to fellow police officers, and he's trying to support his point. How is he supposed to describe his point, what he is seeing and what he's trying to express may happen if fellow officers don't stop behaving this way, if he doesn't use words you "dislike"? If he doesn't cite examples? He advocated for non-violence the whole video, the whole reason he created the video was to potentially wake up fellow LEO to avoid continuing going down this path that could potentially lead to discord in society and violence.

          I can't say this enough: you are not the target demographic of this video, he is not warning you, nor I, of anything. He's describing behaviors that he sees that are wrong among his "brothers in blue", being practiced by fellow officers, and telling them why their actions are wrong using the Bill of Rights and Constitution as his source for why their actions as of late have been wrong. He's also letting them know what may potentially happen if they continue going down this path - it will further divide civilians and police when they should be working together.

          I honestly don't know what part of this you don't understand.

          i dont trust him.

          what is he doing?

          you are a liar.

          stop him.

          i must find a way to trick him.

          okay d00d, hope you feel better.

          [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          So the freedom to think for yourself is above your pay grade?

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          And you deserve a raise for not being the nuisance.