all 3 comments

[–]RM-Goetbbels 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Wow, that was some fake ass shit right there.

Those posts did not incite or insinuate violence at all.

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Their reasoning is incredibly stupid. If the following incites violence:

To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.

then all speech incites violence.

[–]wary_observer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are not stupid, but I would not call it reasoning.

I suppose they have made some bizarre extrapolation, like: "If he will not be going to the inauguration, that is because he refuses to concede the election, in which he was clearly defeated, and which was clearly fair. This is the latest example of what an unreasonable man he is, and how he cares only about himself. He is flouting (being 'violent' towards) our democracy. Therefore, his statement is a dog-whistle to his extremist support base to come to Washington and commit 'violence.'"