you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

These sound like pretty complex fetal cells, seeing as how the lab needs to cover the cost of shipping the cells, and can grow their own tissue samples to use indefinitely. In fact, they sound like Schrödinger's cat, existing in two states of being.. In fact their existence, price and need seems highly dependent on the argument you wish to make at the moment. Along with a secret Chinese cult that you claim that you don't believe in, but that you believe others do, who wish for them to exist to justify their world view, against your world view.

It's all so derivative of what I can only assume are assumptions made on your part. What one could call a a matrix of projections in order support your arguments. Or to put it more bluntly, a huge stack of bullshit you've made up in your head. In order to justify abortions, that you call healthcare, from the evil Chinese and Christian religious groups. Of which you believe, only one of, actually exists, while still apposing the other.... Somehow.

Simply amazing!

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your sarcasm has now officially reached the level where I can't tell whether you're trying to to communicate something or whether you're just dancing around with your fingers up your nose.

All I'm doing is telling it like it is. PP sometimes provides fetal tissue to research laboratories at cost. They are not running a large-scale fetal organs marketplace. There's no market for that.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

This isn't sarcasm. I am restating your arguments back to you, assuming good faith on your part. As all of these talking points have been generated per your replies.

As per my last reply however, I was incapable of maintaining said assumptions of good faith on your part as the arguments you yourself have crafted, weighing against each other have become to improbable.

"""There is no market for that."""

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, you weren't restating my arguments at all. You were doing some mixture of creating ridiculous parodies of my arguments and falling back on your pre-planned arguments against people who are not me.

And ultimately it all just turned into a slop of unreadable nonsense. I couldn't tell where the satire ended and the inability to communicate a thought began.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No, you weren't restating my arguments at all. You were doing some mixture of creating ridiculous parodies of my arguments and falling back on your pre-planned arguments against people who are not me.

Wow. I am a complex genius! Am I a super villain? Are you my hype man? Are you a hype man for a super villain that is me?

I couldn't tell where the satire ended and the inability to communicate a thought began.

Man! You make that sound so cool! You should introduce people at parties! I can see it now, you'd make even the most mundane of guests sound super cool, and important!

Or you just got confused, as you were so wrapped up in your predetermined assumptions of how conversations in a digital age should go, that you didn't perceive what was actually taking place.

Or both, as all things are happening simultaneously, and binary choices are false. ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ

[–]Hematomato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or you just got confused, as you were so wrapped up in your predetermined assumptions of how conversations in a digital age should go, that didn't perceive what was actually taking place.

How truly silly of me to think that "conversations in a digital age" should involve any actual communication.

Also, dude, read one of your sentences out loud sometime.