you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zahn 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

It was an oversight for me to paint this with such a broad brush stroke. Yet, Socks was okay injecting defenseless children with an experimental "vaccine". Many shills of his caliber echo this sentiment often. It is un-ethical to use the vulnerable and children as guinea pigs for corporate profiteering. Therefore, people who advocate for this then fail to measure up to a basic modicum of accepted universal human behavior that would protect vulnerable members of society from potentially or provably dangerous things. Hence, the deserved subhuman label.

It's a boring but rewarding hobby for me to spot shills in the wild. Sort of like bird watching perhaps. There are so many different varieties, tactics and flavors of forum community disrupters. But no Comrade, I have no interest in hunting down people that simply disagree. There is a time and space for everyone to co-exist peacefully with meaningful discussion. It's just that the "shills" do not understand this premise and cannot help themselves from infiltrating spaces that differ in beliefs from them with the intention of ruining these spaces for everyone.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yet, Socks was okay injecting defenseless children with an experimental "vaccine".

I see a lot of pro-Russian shills here and yet I don't stalk them like a lunatic, I just post what I have to say about it when I'm in the mood and then go outside.

It's a boring but rewarding hobby for me to spot shills in the wild.

Who do you think socks was hurting on this site that's full of anti-system people?

[–]Zahn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

pro-Russian shills

Being neutral about Russia or even expressing disagreement with Western hegemony doesn't equal pro-whatever and doesn't make the commenter a pro-Russian shill.

Who do you think socks was hurting on this site that's full of anti-system people?

He was attempting to use the platform as a free advertisement for his twisted cookie cutter establishment narrative and thereby disrupting conversation. It was like having Snopes or Reddit immediately interjected into what would of been a meaningful discovery discussion. I don't mind disagreement, but Socks was such a preposterous normie level rebuttal, it was intellectually offensive. If we wanted to hear what Reddit-tards think, we' be on Reddit. We come here for a higher level of non-censored discussion. This is not a place for his type of pathological authoritarian ilk, and candidly speaking it's not at all welcome...by my standards. However, it was okay to a degree by M7. I understood and accepted M7's viewpoint on the Socks matter.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

free advertisement for his twisted cookie cutter establishment narrative and thereby disrupting conversation

Same with Reddit. There are anti-vaxers, "racists" etc. who are "disrupting the conversation" as well and they would like to get rid of them.

We come here for a higher level of non-censored discussion.

This is not a place for his type of pathological authoritarian ilk

What an irony.