you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

all of... ?

Indeed - not all accusations will be proven correct, but there has been sufficient evidence to show at a number of the protests armed white supremacists who were there to cause trouble and some of them to cause fires. Some of those videos I did not find with my 5 minute search, but I shouldn't have to do your research for you. You've made unsubstantiated claims that are easily debunked. As I've noted: check your sources. With regard to the issue of blacks also causing trouble: yes that also happened. But it's not that simple.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I haven't made any positive claims. You have. That claim is false and you've so far failed to substantiate it, which is your duty in an argument where you have asserted a positive claim. you say this should be easy, yet you appear to be experiencing difficulty with it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

What? I provided evidence, and you can find more if you wish. Jesus...

[–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No. You attempted and failed to provide evidence.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I offered evidence. Get a grip. You can also find more if you want to.

[–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Nope. Your list of non-evidence included links to BLMers being violent at rightwing events and authorities presenting black arrestees as "white supremacists". And an antifa who shitlibs have misidentified twice. And BLMers who communists don't want to count as true BLMers because they aren't anticapitalist. There. I've summarized your failed attempt again.

You're welcome to try again. I'm not going on a snipe hunt for material which doesn't exist. You may though.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It won't work to continue turning this back on me. If you don't want to know, and don't want to read those links, or consider the inaccuracy of your statements, or a quick search, then that's on you. I've done enough. I am not responsible for your failures and your attempts to avoid the facts. Your lack of knowledge is not an excuse to make any claim you wish, without any evidence.

[–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I literally addressed each item you presented in the order in which you presented them and described their content to you, eviscerating each one. What can you possibly expect to gain from carrying on like this. You're known as a clown throughout this site. This is why.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That doesn't make them correct arguments, not in the least, because they're not based on facts or evidence (as I've already argued). I am not sure why you persist.