California Becomes the First State to Ban Fur Products
submitted 3 years ago by redheadgirl from (yahoo.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]dissidentrhetoric 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (5 children)
What do you wear, synthetics?
I am against fur myself but thought cold climates still needed it.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (4 children)
[removed]
[–]ExecuteHomophobes 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
So you won't wear fur but you will continue to support degenerative agriculture by wearing a crop with a long history of enabling the slave trade.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (2 children)
[–]ExecuteHomophobes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
Have you seen what cotton monocropping did to the South? It isn't pretty, and I'm not just talking in terms of the human costs of slavery. Add in 150 years of chemical fertilizers and government subsidies to the same carbohydrate industry that had just as great a role in enabling slavery as cotton, and you compound the problem.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]dissidentrhetoric 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–][deleted] (4 children)
[removed]
[–]ExecuteHomophobes 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[removed]
[–]ExecuteHomophobes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)