Human Trafficking Arrests up by 800% under Trump

submitted by [deleted] from (youtu.be)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yishengqingwa666 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

This, and the fact that Biden wants to destroy all remaining sex-based rights for girls and women by passing the "Equality Act", is why I am no longer a Democrat. #peaktrans #transcult

[–]beethy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

I'm not glowing but can you explain why this is bad? "The Equality Act is a bill in the United States Congress, that, if passed, would amend the Civil Rights Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, public accommodations, public education, federal funding, credit, and the jury system"

It's not clear to me.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

Yeah that's what they want you to believe. But if you read the whole text, you will see there is much more than that. "It will end discrimination" (and allow pedophiles an all-you-can-rape buffet nationwide) more like.

[–]PleaseDoTapTheGlass 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Can you point to the language that would allow for that?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (22 children)

Nope. But that's still what they are aiming for. If not with this law, then somewhere down the line.

[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Love it. Make a comment but unable to source it or even point to the text where the language supports what you say. Then you make a hypothetical statement to support your false claim. Not bringing that A game today my friend. Are they still paying you guys enough? Seems like the shilling has gotten much worse lately....

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

You can be as myopic as you want and dissect the text of any single proposed bill and find that the fine print does not allow pedophilia per se.

But then you could also look at the wider trend of things and see that what I speak of is EXACTLY where things are purposely headed. BTW thank you for the "fun" points. :-)

Also, look: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/13/gov-gavin-newsom-signs-bill-reducing-penalties-for-sodomy-with-minors/

But sure, I'm a shill. Sigh. But I get it: you are a pedophile and want to downplay the rampant destruction of civilization.

[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Yes I could do all those things but that doesn't take away from the fact that you were unable to substantiate the claim you made and instead decided to make up some hypothetical situation that backed up your original unsubstantiated claim. And then you post an article from a clearly biased news source that has nothing to do with the original bill you made the claim about...? Again I ask are they paying you enough? This is terrible discourse, let's try and do better my friend. Love the ending though, never miss a chance to call anyone who disagrees with you a this or that. You won't get a rise out of me my shill friend. This isn't Reddit, there are very intelligent people on this site. If you make a claim be ready to back it up. Not with biased news articles but instead with the language in the text that you claimed was there. That's an honest conversation.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're the one using the shill tactic of calling people names and then pointing out that "they're starting it" by replying in kind. Very cute.

[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Still waiting for you to show us where in this bill specifically there is language that supports your claim. That's all I'm interested in. Do you have that information or not? It seems like you don't...?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Lmao, you were basically calling him a shill when you responded to him by saying "we got folks like you here, so the shilling has indeed gotten much worse lately." lol where do they hire you people

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Do you just respond to comments without looking at the name? Funny stuff my friend. You complement me on one response and try to shame me on another. Thanks and no thanks...? I responded to him multiple times so to take one response and magnify it is disingenuous. I explained why I think he is shilling. He made a claim and when someone asked him to show us where to language was in the bill that backed up that claim he could not provide that information and instead made up a dramatic hypothetical situation that backed up his original unsubstantiated claim. That's shilling. Not very good shilling but still shilling. Also, in the future try to look at who you're responding too. You can't compliment me in one response and shame me in another. I'm making the same point in both responses silly.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I would watch out with breitbart as a source. They are a Mossad front and the zioCons are hijacking the right and anti-pedo movement, whilst mostly being pedos themselves. They know the only way to survive in the US is to work with Christians and the right whilst covertly funding degeneracy.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh yes, I've pointed out that the turn of phrase "sodomy with minors" is of a casual tone and implies consent. It's actually RAPING CHILDREN. Their using this turn of phrase is subtle indoctrination to desensitize to the issue. It is crafty and evil.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They play with language to make their actions seem more legitimate. Taxes are theft without proper representation, mandatory insurance is literally a protection racket, and property tax is literally a forced rent on living. Sodomizing a minor is raping children. Pedophilia isn't "child-love" its child torture.

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Can you point us to the language on the bill where it says that? As mult people have pointed out breitbart is not a legit source. Still wanting on the information to back up this claim.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"on the basis of sexual orientation" is the language that they will use to defend their heinous actions. I'm certain that there is plenty more hidden within the act.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's thoroughly bad. Their "one step at a time" doctrine works, obviously.

    [–]Exconduckducktor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    How bout prison? Where do you draw the insanity line?