you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

LOL, socks responded to your comment with "Snowflake?" Seems like the hypocrite is calling you a name. I wonder if that's a bannable offense.

I wouldn't stoop to name-calling but if I did I might call socks an obnoxious unending klaxon of misinfo noise, though that's not really much as far as name-calling goes so maybe I'd call socks a corporate kiss-ass fart-catcher, but perhaps that's not concise enough so a fecal abortion might be a better, more creative, way of calling socks a semi-human piece of shit. But I won't actually resort to name-calling because that's against the rules.

Besides, we already know socks is a timesuck, hypocrite, liar, and shill.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

LOL, socks responded to your comment with "Snowflake?"

Oh darn. It's a shame I can't see that. It would be different if he weren't a disingenuous shill, and 'just had different ideas'. But like blaring mexican or polka music on an early Sunday morning, his obnoxious shilling is unwanted.

This way, I'm not tempted to read or reply to his ridiculous bullshit cogent and insightful thoughts on all the Nazis to the right of Karl Marx. Better for everyone, imo.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

UPDATE: socks deleted her simplistic "Snowflake?" response comment.