history

history

all 25 comments

turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

You posted a video asking chat GPT about Millennia Trump posed nude on a history sub?

In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

She is the former first lady of the United States of America. Ironically, she was born in Slovenia.

turtlew0rk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

So what does a video of asking chatgpt for nudes have to do with history?

In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

The former first lady of the United States posed nude in more than one magazine. She is the only one in the history of the United States to do so.

Hematomato 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

It looks like what it's telling you is that it's been programmed to censor all information on who has or hasn't posed naked, even if that information is freely available on Google.

LLMs are currently much more censored than search engines. GPT-4 is almost guaranteed to scold you if you talk about a woman's body in any way.

In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

It was not that she posed naked, but that I asked if she repented. The propaganda machine does not want to admit that sexual promiscuity is a moral problem.

She played the part of being a Christian, but I have yet to hear her regret posing naked in public magazines. Her husband also does not admit his faults. It's the basics of being Christian: Repent, receive forgiveness from Jesus, and learn from him to achieve psychological maturity.

[deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

It's the basics of being Christian: Repent, receive forgiveness from Jesus

Article Six of the US Constitution says that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States", the continuous requirement by the people that the presidential office be held by those who value Jesus above all is unconstitutional. It otherwise implies that there is a desire to have no separation between church and the state, which is concerning.

In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

That is a different topic. This discussion is about Artificial Intelligence as a Propaganda Machine which refuses to answer certain questions because the rulers of this world do not want people to know or think about it. And the other point is that people pretend to be religious and yet are hypocrites. No one forced Melania and Donald to act like they were Christians, but since they did, how could anyone trust them when their actions do not match up with their words?

WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

BIG BROTHER IS AI!

ShoahKahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

Melania posed nude, was an illegal immigrant, and was treated like a whore by the press. Irrespective, "Michelle" Obama looks like a inordinately ugly gorilla, could well be male, and was treated like she was a cover girl... So, yeah. Whatev's 😴

In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

Each should work out their own salvation with fear and trembling.

no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

OP, it's well known that Jesus introduced Melania to Donald in the form of a nude photo - a vision, if you will - at which point he asked his assistent to send her a marriage proposal (and of course she accepted; literaly a match made in Heaven).

In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

You have put yourself in danger for joking about the Lord doing something perverted, which he would not. Repent while you can so you may be forgiven.

no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

Omniscient God would understand, though might punish you for your hubris (because you are telling others they are in danger of an angry, dumb God's wrath).

In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

I said nothing of God's wrath. I said you put yourself in danger. Whenever a man loses respect for his God and Creator and begins to joke about him, he is far from God's protection. Beware because your enemy is like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour. If you forget to give your God the honor he deserves, as your Lord and Savior, then you are vulnerable and without help against your enemies.

no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

You obviously imply God's wrath or whatever danger related to God one wants to consider. If that was not the danger you referred to, tell me specifically how your comment about the danger I am supposedly in - in relation to God - can be any other type of danger. Use logic.

You also assume to know that I am in danger because of God's concerns, thereby assuming to know that I am in danger because of your interpretation of God's reading of my joke. That's hubris. You don't know what God thinks. Your interpretatation is not necessarily God's interpretation. To assume that it is God's interpretation is overestimating your abilities, as somehow capable of knowing God's thoughts on the subject.

You also insult an omniscient God by assuming that God would be so dumb as to misunderstand my joke. Omniscient God isn't a dumb narcissist asshole micromanager. You have to think of a being who knows everything and is the most intelligent, and that God understands jokes, especially against demons like Trump.

iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 months ago

Nobody cares because conservatives don't look at ugly chicks naked pictures and liberals dont mind the chicks doing porn LMAO