You have linked climate change to environmental damage because the article juxtaposes these 2 things in it. Do you see the problem? There is no cause and effect, it's simply expecting you to have an emotional reaction, and then for you to bridge that gap on your own. Now lets talk about 'carbon footprint' shall we? All life on earth is carbon based. This will remain a reality, even if all humans die. And plants thrive on CO2. Their next target? Nitrogen. 78% of the atmosphere is nitrogen. It's the bases of fertilizer. Do we talk about the power grid, and how it is impossible for anything more than a minority to go electric?

Even die hard liberal Matt Groening new whats up 32 years ago, when the world had already been forecasted to have ended.

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/fc3c7b2e-512f-4c56-ac81-cbba5857217e

You want us to pretend that an electric car is more energy efficient than a gas vehicle or diesel? Because it's not.

climate deniers,

Simple labels, are used to more easily discredit people. It's an aspect of physiological conditions. It's is done as it is easier to label and discredit, then to think about what is being said. As a person who has recently spoken up about the pyramid of debate, I am well certain you know what that is called. Name calling. /\/\