The burden of proof lies in the person(s) asserting an event happened. Holocaustians fail miserably at that. The revisionists only need to prove falsification is occurring and the entire holocaust narrative comes unraveled. David Irving famously pointed out that there's really only like 11 holocaust historians and they quote circle themselves and they have infinite support by corporate, government and legal teams with endless money when they are questioned.

The root of the holohoax argument is this: Hitler put Jews in black box political camps that nobody knew what was going on in and since he's such a bad person and since our totally honest Jewish people say he tortured and gassed them relentlessly then everyone needs to accept that's what happened. If you demand evidence you hate Jews and need to be harassed until you change your mind or have your life destroyed. Don't see the problem here? If you're wavering on the holocaust being a hoax just sit with some of Eric Hunt's documentaries that walk you through the mountains of bullshit.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/W1Qsy9iY93I3/

If you think about it the entire holocaust event is like a rape hoax case. Just believe the women; she obviously has no incentive to lie! There's a reason that anglo society held courts and hard evidence up so high. They were trying to prevent all of these historical grievance tricks.