you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

There's an ambiguity regarding the nature of building churches on previously Pagan sacred grounds. Neopagans do indeed describe this as straightforward iconoclasm, while conspiracy aware sources such as Fritz Springmeier interpret this the other way around: it points to a hidden element in the power structure to whom these grounds were still sacred, and that's why they had the churches built on those spots. Rockefellers built on top of spots that were important to cannibalistic giants, and they're listed as an illuminati bloodline; this further supports the conspiratorial interpretation of the practice in general.

I don't have an answer to your question, I'm just emphasizing the ambiguity: even when something appears as Catholic iconoclasm on the surface, it could be a cover for the motivations of a hidden group.

[–]VraiBleuScots Protestant, Ulster Loyalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cannibalistic giants? Illuminati bloodlines? In all honesty If you’re interested in politics nobody is going to take you seriously when you say things like that. Worse you’re harming white interests by association.