PSA: How to favor blacks and still discriminate against them

submitted by DragonerneJesus is white from (self.debatealtright)

So this is just a small guide to fellow alt righters.

How do you navigate a world of anti whites? And still manage to put out pro white policies? You do this by favoring blacks!

Look up the concept of the simpsons paradox. It is a statistical paradox where you basically mix apples and oranges, so the end result is misleading-- but it can also be used as a tool to do the opposite: make the apples and oranges misleading.

So say you have a bank and you give out loans, etc.

One office is located in an area with 100 blacks and 20 whites, the other office is located in an area with 100 whites and 20 blacks.
In the majority black area, you have an acceptancerate of 30% for blacks and 25% for whites (clearly favoring blacks); 30 blacks, 5 whites.
In the majority white area, you have an acceptancerate of 50% for blacks and 40% for whites (clearly favoring blacks again); 10 blacks, 40 whites.

In total you end up with 30+10=40 blacks and 5+40=45 whites. So you end up with more whites getting accepted by the bank than blacks despite blacks being favored by your system in every office of your company.

If it didn't seem complicated, then you should feel blessed, because it is called a paradox for a reason. Most people wont be able to understand how this works and that is to our advantage. Especially colorblind cuckservatives wont understand this concept "How can blacks being favored be discrimination", it seems impossible for their brains.

Please do apply this whenever possible.

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah except in the real world banks just give free money to blacks which they don't pay a penny back then use this as an excuse to further increase interest rates increasing the yoke of finance-slavery on whites. Then they end up getting bailed out with white tax money anyway.

There's no real application of anything like this for any of us anyway, and if there were applications IE we had the power to choose this stuff we wouldn't have to do this because being anti-white wouldn't be a pillar of our societies anymore.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It doesn't have to be a bank. The principle can be applied to anything. A bank is just easy to illustrate.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Such as?

Also a thing to point out with this is when your company is analysed/audited the entirety will be taken into account so even your example wouldn't work if we owned a bank, or an education institution with multiple branches or something.

This sounds clever but it is just that, it's basically just mental masturbation like 'here's how we can sneak past the jew guys' but it has no actual application to anything.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hiring, pay, policing, grading, basically any decision making

They do this with IQ tests too, to advantage women. The exercises that women do well in, they raise the ceiling and floor and increase the frequency. The exercises that men do well in, they decrease the ceiling and floor and decrease the frequency. This way they can control the average score of different groups. Basically they give a higher weight to areas where pro-biased group is overrepresented and likewise lower the weight where they are underrepresented.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This isn't how the oppression industrial complex works. Blacks are perpetually oppressed. Statistics can't change this conclusion, because it is already decided. If you have statistics suggesting blacks aren't oppressed, the goal posts move or different statistics become the focus.

Secondly, your statistics are compared year over year or time period over time period. If your nigger acceptance rate isn't increasing, your bank is white supremacist.

Statistics that dont fit the narrative are rejected or ignored. Remember the Asian hate crime epidemic last year that was all over the yidivision and all those statistics about niggers brutally attacking chinamen? Me either. The statistics were ignored and the narrative was white supremacy strikes again.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you have statistics suggesting blacks aren't oppressed, the goal posts move or different statistics become the focus.

It's like a conveyor belt of white suppression. There's no end point where we've given black people enough gibs. The only end point is where whites are totally decimated as a cohesive racial group with control over property and government. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the end goal is total extinction of whites.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a fair point

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're intentions are honest here. You want to find a way to get around Jewish tyranny to help whites. However, if you do this long enough you lift up blacks and degenerate whites. Your banking equation leaves out the fact that over time millions of dollars would be witheld from whites that would have earned it under mono racial conditions. It's not moral or ethical to racially suppress whites in favor of other races. It's also not moral or ethical to lift up blacks artificially on the backs of another race. They can lift themselves up.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks!
It only appears to be in favor of blacks. Overall you favor whites. So you're in fact not artificially lifting up blacks, but rather you're supressing them while appearing to be favoring them. It is an unintuitive paradox. Notice how 45 whites were chosen while only 40 blacks were chosen. This is while assuming equal population sizes of 100 whites and 100 blacks. So while it may appear to be that we're lifting up blacks, in actuality we end up with a 45% acceptance rate for whites and only a 40% acceptance rate for blacks. This can obviously be scaled to an arbitrary disparity in favor of whites (within reasonable ranges).

I agree entirely with your point about mono racial conditions, and we can aim towards that goal, but this method of discrimination is aimed at solving a problem within multi racial conditions.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Only absolute bottom feeder idiots aren't going to realize how this works. You're just weighting higher acceptance rates to the white population. Upper class Jews are going to see this and fuck you

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is a well known statistical paradox for a reason, so while it seems simple once explained, it isn't intuitive for the vast majority of people without an explanation.