you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

There are laws now that go towards these protections, laws that have had to evolve to encompass the changes in understanding child development. Abuse can happen in ANY situation, regardless of class, race, being male OR female. Yes, it does likely have more frequency within single family households, we probably don't need to see statistics to understand that a ton of damaging shit can happen to children within those households.

My thought process is to be critical about everything, all potentials-- past and present. It happened regardless of a nuclear family environment. Why? You can't seek out prevention of any of this sort of shit without understanding that it occurs at all and the reasonings behind it. My question was what your movement poses as a good option to pose protections, and this comes with the obvious fucking assumption that you're starting from scratch. You're not going to just simply transition into having some sort of alt-right political establishment without completely deconstructing the system currently in place. Am I wrong?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

it's obviously against the law to choke and kill a two year old. No need for more laws there. But a man who doesn't have higher brain functions won't think about the future of spending life in prison, so laws will have no effect on his actions.