The wrong side won WW2.

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No - it stands for inclusion, free speech, the American Dream, etc, etc. Those pushing hatred for others are trying to divide people. These special groups want to be included. GOP and "alt right" want to sow hatred and division between groups, to let them know they aren't included. (Edit cross through 'special')

[–]Rob3122 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What makes any of those groups "special"? They are trying to push all the bullshit I mentioned in schools to kids. Kids like Democrats act on emotion. Teaching them CRT is teaching them to hate. BLM...I don't even need to explain that bullshit. LGBTQ is trying to convert children to be gay and tranny freaks. Chaos is all it creates which is why the jew scum are pushing it through all the Democrats they own.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This changes the argument.

The argument is about inclusion, not about who is 'special'.

The argument is not about Democrats, but about democracy.

[–]Rob3122 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You said they were special. I asked why and you didn't answer...instead YOU changed the argument. You don't even know what democracy is, all you know is Jewocracy posing as democracy. Wake up!

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Though I've called these groups 'special' the point remains that the topic is 'inclusion', not 'special'. I've now edited the statement so that 'special' is crossed out. You don't have to focus on the 'special' word, but instead consider the argument about inclusion.

It's basic logic, Rob: who wants division? Does the group that wants inclusion also want division? Does the group that wants to exclude other groups want division? Think about it, rather than worry about an unrelated word. Don't fall for the right-wing divisive propaganda. They don't want unity and exclusion. They want to divide and take your money and that of the 99%. They're robbing you.

[–]Rob3122 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know the Republicans don't want it either. But they're not pushing all the catering to negroids, they're not pushing CRT, they're certainly not pushing the acceptance of gay and tranny shit. All that shit causes division.

"It's basic logic, Rob: who wants division? Does the group that wants inclusion also want division". The group that lies to your fucking face and then turns around and does the opposite. Just look at BLM. The dems cater to that bullshit movement and then what do they do? They make sure the attorney general's and judges keep letting the negroids who are shooting people back onto the street. Then they act surprised when the shoot and/or kill again.