Vincent James' best video. When Critical Race Theory Leads to anti-White Violence.

submitted by [deleted] from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

colonized, enslaved, exploited, and committed genocide

As have blacks, arabs, natives/tribes, hispanics, asians.

Blacks still do this.

The ones who aren't ceaselessly thankful to be living in a white western nation deserve worse than nothing for bringing net gains of murder and misery.

Your trolling performance has resulted in a hellish sentence.

You are hereby sentenced to live in a high black population nation resembling your trolling fantasies. Have fun in the Congo.

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

As have blacks, arabs, natrives/tribes, hispanics, asians.

Name one genocide that rivals what Europeans did to Native Americans that also wasnt caused by white people.

[–]Yin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Most natives died from diseases that their immune systems couldn't handle and from killing themselves in tribal warfare and then in warfare against European settlers. Would they prefer speaking Japanese or Chinese at this point in the global power dynamic? I can assure you, Asian settlers would not have been anywhere as merciful as white Europeans. Your point is illogical from the start.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I can assure you, Asian settlers would not have been anywhere as merciful as white Europeans.

I, for one, am not convinced by your assurance.

There's Asian groups in Malaysia and in Indonesia. And there's Indian groups in Fiji. They didn't commit genocide. Racial friction exists, but they moved in and live with the locals, more or less co-operatively. They didn't drive them off the land, or refuse to acknowledge them as human.

On what basis, do you feel so assured of this speculative and specious claim?

Or are you using "I can assure you" to mean you've got no evidence, and it's wrong, but I'd like you to discourage you from questioning it, because I don't want you to notice how paper thin the evidence is?

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    That's a "Yes"?

    You are using "I can assure you" to mean "I can't sure you, but I would like you to think I can"?

    You're not constructing any rational arguments.