I actually agree on these points, though the last comment - relating to the existence of DAR - might be answered by this:

If DAR is in /r/subscribed, instead of r/all, it arguably retains its userbase, but it's also OK on r/all, depending on what Saidit wants of its site. What is interesting to me is that so many of the DAR posts are often at the top of r/all, which of course is an organic aspect of Saidit's users' interests. Not that this is necessarily a problem for most Saiditors, but if Saidit is to grow its userbase, it is unlikely to keep new users who disagree with DAR. And I appreciate that Saidit might not want users who disagree with DAR. But here's the rub: many users at DAR promote hate speech and extremism. This can work against the causes of DAR, when, for example, ane of the manipulations of Zionist and Russian disinformation propaganda is to identify concerns about racism as anti-white. This is meant to polarize the social media discourse about race, as has been Critical Race Theory, another manufactured non-issue that's meant to piss off people on the right. DAR often blindly promotes this hateful agenda by the trolls of the 1%, who are paid to sow dischord. I think M7 understood this form of extremist self-pawnage, per his discussions on Youtube, for which there is a long history. I think hate speech should be allowed, but not the main identity of Saidit, which seems to have developed on much of the top posts of r/all. It's just something worth considering. I am not recommending that DAR be removed from r/all, but that Saidit and DAR should be a bit more self-critical, and consider global trends in social media, in order to evaluate what is promoted here.