you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DeepCrimsonPillFifth Position 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think the dissident right needs to take the L on this one. Not saying it leads to the healthiest of lifestyles, but so far I've seen little evidence that homosexuality is acquired or associated with pedophilia. If we can't back up any of our claims with real statistics, our arguments will lose over time. I think the best thing we can do is give them an olive branch as long as they realize their place in the hierarchy. Pagan society wasn't fire and brimstone over it, so I think it would be unhealthy if we tried to force it back.

[–]Richard_ParkerHard-line, right-wing authoritarian 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

but so far I've seen little evidence that homosexuality is acquired or associated with pedophilia.

Right-winger Devon Stack is adamant this is the case. He did a livestream with Ramzpaul that is now only on bitchute. It is well worth a listen. He does rely on anecdotal evidence but also expresses doubt how a gay gene would carry since gays cannot naturally have children unless they override their natural sexual preferences for procreation. It is not as simple as that though because there is some indication that women who have kids later in life or have lots of kids (and the youngest later in life), there is greater association of homosexuality in those male offspring because there is a testosterone deficiency in the "bath" that the fetus is immersed in during incubation. Also happens a lot with maternal male twins, with one twin having less testosterone. If you go to his Insomnia stream last Thursday, he talks about how social mores have really slipped drastically in the past 30 years, as we went from "don't say gay" to Blues Clues Drag Queen Singing, Drag Queen Story Hour etc.

[–]pcpmasterrace 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He does rely on anecdotal evidence but also expresses doubt how a gay gene would carry since gays cannot naturally have children unless they override their natural sexual preferences for procreation.

There's a plausible genetic explanation, and for "simply gay" it's pretty straightforward: the same gene that would cause men to be strongly attracted to men would also cause women to be strongly attracted to men - and this causes enough of a boost to the number of children a woman has for that gene to persist.