I will admit that I only read part of this thread outright, skimming other parts. Concerning whether homosexuality is genetic or created from environmental and cultural factors, it is not a simple, binary either or proposition.

There is some evidence that the older a woman gets, or more boys she has, the more likelihood the youngest son is gay because of problems with the "testosterone" bath that a male fetus is immersed in during incubation. This also happens a great deal with identical twins.

On the other hand, the evidence that homosexuality tendencies--particularly in women--are greatly influenced by sociological and cultural factors is pretty clear, and pretty clear with but a cursory look at the culture and current social mores. Since the 90s, with normalization of porn in society, including girl-girl, threesomes, things like Girls Gone Wild, the prevalence of bisexualty in women from Generation Down has increased persisently. The social pressures which normalize this, make it a key feature in desirable, hypergamous women to allure the most socially dominant males are evident for all to see. None of this things can seriously be argued by anyone. I do not need studies to prove any of the statements above, as these things are as prevalent and as obvious as the fact that people are usually having sex before marriage.

We also have hard data. Something like 16 percent of Zoomers--ZOOM, ZOOM, ZOOM--identify as gay. This is because homosexuality is encouraged and celebrated in this sick culture. This is on the heels of the remarkable way in which LGB+ have been more ostentacious and obnoxious, replete with drag queen story hour, childrens books and childrens programs etc. Correlation does not always mean causation but there can be no other rational explanation in this instance.

While men seem more hard-wired to be either homosexual or heterosexual (most gay men I have known have identifed as such since an earlier age), and while it is true straight men have a hard-coded, visceral reaction to seeing men make out or being exposed to images of gay sex, I am not even sure is immune from social conditioning at an early age.

I will disclose that my earliest memories of sexual desire include seeing Deborah Harry in Blondie videos when I was six or seven in first grade. I also though Lady Di was really beautiful wanted to kiss her (this was in early 80s). I really believe that seeing images of Deborah Harry, probably not entirely appropriate for a small boy, set the course for the hardwiring I now have. I cannot say with any real assurance that a similar boy would be similarly effected by seeing some gay at a gay pride. Given how widespread pederasty and bisexuality in men was in certain Ancient civilizations, I believe men too are subject to social and cultural conditioning.

For that reason, I want young boys exposed to things like Deborah Harry--still suggestive but decent enough. Keep the fag shit under wraps, in the closet.