you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"Very successful and noble" as defined by...? China was never what romanticists think it was. Before Mao, they never had running water, electricity, industrialization, literacy, and every other conceivable metric for success as a nation. Over 50 million of innocents died because A) Mao was an incompetent tool and B) A BILLION people were rapidly advanced into modernity causing severe growing pains

I've been to China and know how they operate, they're not individualists naturally like Westerners. They function as a collective, and the current implementation of communism is the best possible fit for them as a people.

[–]Minedwe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's untrue. Chiang Kai-shek and his Kuomintang were the best option China had, but Jew-supported regimes like Stalin's supported Mao. Communism doesn't work, period. What they've done is like the opposite of Third Positionism. Rather than taking the best parts of capitalism and leftism and combining them, while adding unique principles as the Third Position does, China's system takes the absolute WORST of each system.