you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WatchOutThere[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

This is mathematically impossible. Hundreds of thousands of votes suddenly counted, and every single one of them goes to ONE candidate.

https://twitter.com/MattMackowiak/status/1323992377380450309?s=09

Look at that! I really hope Trump brings this to the Supreme Court to challenge it instead of cucking.

[–]WaltzRoommate 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trump

instead of cucking

Literally laughed out loud at this one.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Wouldn't they go to a single candidate in an update we see if they were simply put in the system all at once, each one of the candidates at a time? Rather than discarding republican votes or something they were just counted and put in separately at a time as they have both increased now.

[–]WatchOutThere[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Could you rephrase your comment? I am having some difficulty correctly interpreting it.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

On the graph it shows a sudden spike where the entirety of votes went to Biden. I'm saying it could be that the Biden votes were counted and put in all at once separately from Trumps. Which explains the suspicious spike for Biden in the update.

[–]WatchOutThere[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Plausible, but that completely goes against any norms when it comes to counting ballots. This only happened in Michigan and Wisconsin, which are both key states and ones Trump won quite easily in 2016. These two states can literally determine who becomes President. Also, why didn't this happen anywhere else in the country and if this is how they went about counting the ballots, why was there not a similar spike for Trump?

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

why was there not a similar spike for Trump?

His votes did come in, Biden had only a 0.5% edge on Trump for a while after Biden's spike. It may be fraud, but I'm only saying this spike isn't quite evidence.

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It makes no sense for them to do that. Why wait to put in the separated Biden votes all at once, instead of counting them as they come? Counting in the sensible way would a) make the Biden lead appear earlier on and b) conceal any fraud that's going on.