Is George Soros basically the Jewish fall guy?

submitted by probgoingtohell from (self.debatealtright)

Literally every right wing conspiracy includes him in some way, even the most normie cuckservative conspiracies in some way try to tie Soros in. Is he basically the Jewish fall guy or scapegoat who absorbs all the criticism and shields any co conspirators or does he actually have a part in the whole subversion thing?

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]AFutureConcern 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

does he actually have a part in the whole subversion thing?

George Soros funds the Open Society Foundations whose mission statement is:

The Open Society Foundations work to build vibrant and inclusive democracies whose governments are accountable to their citizens.

Note the "vibrant and inclusive" dog whistle which is code for the Great Replacement, and "democracies" which means spreading liberalism and exaltation of the weak to the world.

The open society is a term coined by Henri Bergson and later expanded upon by Karl Popper. Both Henri Bergson and Karl Popper were Jewish.

Karl Popper defined the open society as one "in which individuals are confronted with personal decisions" as opposed to a "magical or tribal or collectivist society." In other words, it's a liberal individualist project fundamentally opposed to nationalism. In a word - globohomo.

This globohomo institution has a $19,590,570,302 endowment, and a $1.2 billion annual budget. It spends (to name just some of the subversive areas it invests in):

  • $137 million on "economic equity and justice"
  • $112 million on "equality and anti-discrimination"
  • $74 million on "justice reform"

George Soros is therefore absolutely a subversive Jewish billionaire, implementing a globohomo vision of society dreamed up by Jewish philosophers.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No I think he's just such an open and obvious parody of the international, cosmopolitan Jew that even your average conservative has noticed his subversive activities. In reality though he suffers no push back and isn't a fall guy in any traditional sense. In fact most of his detractors claim the reason he's doing what he does is because he's a Nazi.

I doubt a bunch of boomers complaining about him night and day in the Breitbart comment section keeps him up at night.

Perhaps you could call him the equivalent of a heel in wrestling but like those entertainers he suffers no actual consequences for playing the role.

[–]probgoingtohell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A jewish Nazi.

[–]Questionablethe Dumpster Arsonist · 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A fall guy that never has to take a fall? Does that make sense to you?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes pretty much, attacking Soros was invented by Arthur Finkelstein. The whole point is to put the blame on one puppet master instead of realising he is just one of many extremely powerful Jews doing the stuff he does.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know but Epstein and if need be Dershowitz are.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, in many ways he is the apex of this phenomena.

There should be a "logical fallacy" for references to phenomena that are very real, but most of the referencers are crackpots- sort of like the opposite of "appeal to authority". George Soros is actually a very fascinating individual with incredible cognition and uses his gifts to destabilize and profiteer. He's very open about this in his 60 minutes interview from the 90's.

I would recommend you watch it instead of listening to theories and hearsay, George is very upfront here about his modus operandi and you can gather a lot about his nature.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZhIrYxOQsI

George is essentially a fatalist. He believes himself to be a man of destiny and thinks that if not him in his role, someone else would take his place therefore there is no "good" or "evil". There is only gaps to exploit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's fascinating too is how paradoxical the 60 minutes interview is.

He opens it with complete amorality claiming that finding exploits is his directive. Halfway through, he then abruptly transitions to moral dogmas... this is completely contradictory. I think it's very clear that George doesn't have any moral prerogative. He destabilizes and profiteers- while he might feign moral decency, I see no reason to believe his Open Society Organization is any different then his attacks on world economies or currencies.