you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sometimes using their own absurd arguments to deconstruct their statements work well.
Just deny the existence of whites:
"Whites are a social construct"

Make them define a white person and keep denying it. Just be as retarded as they are. It's not a winning argument but its certain to create cognitive dissonance and will likely make them very mad at you for using their own words against them.

Remember while double think is inconsistent and hypocritical when applied by them, it can just as easily be applied with the opposite intention.
Their perspective:
Whites exist when they are bad.
Whites don't exist when they are good.

It can just be turned around:
Whites exist when they are good.
Whites don't exist when they are bad.

They have no problem with using this kind of logic because they're anti-white and arguments or facts don't matter to them.
I have no problem using their kind of logic because I'm pro-white and it exposes the absurdity of their own positions.

It's the equivalent of saying "Mirror". Not a winning argument, but its easy to use with zero effort.

[–]UserAetheria 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Basically this. When it comes to a hypothetical ethnostate they love to say things like 'What even is white?' or 'I'm half white half black, will you let me in to the ethnostate?' They attack the definition of white and try to turn it into some vague idea. But when it comes to fucking over whites with things like ending white privilege they know exactly whats white and whats not white. When it comes to affirmative action they know exactly whats black and whats not black.