You didn't even interact with the points I brought up, you're just using bad faith tactics as usual. I never said Rhodesia was a paradise, and it probably wasn't, but relative to most of sub-Saharan Africa (especially in its current, post-colonial condition) it definitely was a "paradise", meaning Rhodesia (unlike modern-day Zimbabwe) at least wasn't a total shithole.

Before the white/European settlers came, all black Zimbabwean natives were living in mudhuts the size of dog pens, running around naked with spears and eating dirt. After colonization, Rhodesia had modern European buildings and technology, a stable food supply, and an educated black middle class that got lifted out of poverty and lived in Salisbury.

And if the native black Zimbabweans are merely acting in their racial interest and are justified in slaughtering and kicking out the white farmers and/or taking their farms without compensation, we are definitely justified in stripping Zimbabwe of all technology and valuable posessions we made and left behind. In fact, maybe we should even destroy all highrises, farms and roads we built there as well.

They can't have it both ways after all; if they slaughter us, kick us out and steal our farms, we might as well take or destroy everything there with us.