What do you think would be the consequences for the White Race if the Soviet Union won the Cold War?

submitted by Salos10000 from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EinmuetigeErhebung 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

European countries would certainly still be ethnically preserved as birth rates would probably have remained fairly high and an inneficient communist economy would never have been able to support massive third world immigration. It wouldn't be a logical path for them to take, either. For a capitalist globalist system ethnic chaos makes perfect sense and aids the elite's goals, but in a communist society it would have been destabilizing.

Education would have decayed more slowly, people would still be relatively cultured and standards would be much higher. No twitter, no widespread english knowledge, no idolatry of american negro culture, no hypersexualization (sex was a taboo in the USSR).

The world would be ruled by a tiny cabal of heavily jewish-influenced communist criminals though, so the fact is that populations would be still be helpless before the will of this tiny and dangerous group. On the end if the day it would still be a godless, materialistic, dumbed-down mass society on the road to an environmental catastrophe. We would probably be living in depressing commie blocks next to a heavily polluting factory working a shit job.

[–]Salos10000[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do Jews have any power in modern day China or Vietnam?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Somewhat as they were required to be linked to the global banking system after their respective wars/revolutions. You will notice war drums beat for any country that goes against the global banking system (Iran, Libya, Iraq, etc).

Seeing as we're going through the second cycle of quantitative easing with zero financial/economic consequence, it's safe to say that money literally doesn't matter and the world's "credit" system is rooted in exclusionary practice instead of actual accreditation.

[–]Salos10000[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You have to back this up with hard evidence.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

With regards to what? I'm not picking small specific events, but rather macroeconomic shifts. Ghaddafi was a well known pusher of the petrodollar and was a thorn in the side of global hegemony. Iranian banking is separated from the world economy and is it's own can of worms- there is a lot to say/read about that. Vietnam only joined WBG in the 50s and it's economic connections to international finance were only strengthened by the 5-year plan in the aftermath of the fall of Saigan.

In regards to quantitative easing, there was RAMPANT speculation that it would lead to inflation in 2008/2009. Every other economics paper was certain that we would pay the price for flooding the market with unbacked currency to float the economy but this never happened. There was very little consequence to printing ungodly amounts of money and now we are doing it all over again.

You should be able to read between the lines here and easily establish that the conspiracies are at least rooted in truth: global finance has a stranglehold on the comings and goings of the world and the "rulebook" that we think we play by is irrelevant. Fiscal responsibility, scarcity, etc all go out the window when the people pulling the strings want them to.

International finance as a whole is undoubtedly more about control than economics.