all 12 comments

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just want to do a little 'we predicth this' on this one. On the old Reddit board -- may it RIP -- there was a lot of sharp people criticizing this 'Karen' trend and the pathetic conservatives who were indulging in it because ultimately it would lead to more anti-White cultural and political trends.

[–]AFutureConcern 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They literally called it after a racial slur against white women. And we all know what they mean by "racist" 911 calls. It means if a black guy is stalking a white woman alone in the park, making her nervous, and she calls the police. All I can advise white women is - don't walk alone in the park. There's literally nothing else you can do. Can't call the cops on the guy, can't fight back or shoot the guy if he assaults you - you'll go to jail if you try.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This "law" is going to be abused so much to get non-white criminals in San Francisco off the hook.

[–]Hadza 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Based subverters bringing us back to chaperoning and traditional society?? I don't know if I should even be mad

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Just for some context, this basically means it is illegal for you to call 911 on a "person of colour" (especially black) and the suspect considers it racist in San Francisco. All 11 seats on the San Fransisco Board of Supervisors are Democrats, so it is highly likely that this will pass unanimously.

[–]deAccount 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No matter how many Republicans were on that board, it'd make zero difference. They'd just impotently tow the line like they always do.

[–]MostBasedRedditor 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is legit something out of the Turner Diaries lmao

[–]americanasallgetout 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]aukofthecovenantWhite man with eyes 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What's interesting about laws like this is how they reverse the direction of justice. Consider a case like:

  • White woman strolls through park, sees sketchy black guy following her
  • White woman calls police
  • Police arrive, guy cries "Racism!" and cites the CAREN Act
  • Woman gets charged

However, for all we or this woman knows, if she had not called police she might have ended up mugged or worse. What, exactly, does Mr. Walton suggest she do that he would not call racist?

Laws like this make the risk for a white person of interacting with a black person go up. I'm sure that will help race relations. No one should be surprised if the result is that white people start seeking to prevent trouble by consciously avoiding black people.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Karen to self: "Should I just pop the guy, grab his phone and flee or call the cops and go to jail?"

[–]ChancellorMershekel 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a good example of the normalization of anti-White attitudes, yet another entry in what should be a fast-growing list of evidence. If some politician proposed a hypothetical 'NIGGA Act', we know exactly how it would be received. Yet here we have something of a very similar nature, except that it somewhat (and, I'm sure, much to the chagrin of feminists) only seems an attack on White women, who would rather point the blame for all things at White men. Not that a hypothetical 'CRACKA Act'—one that would be a clear attack on all Whites—would be received any differently. Some people, especially White feminists, would indeed prefer it, for they could then tell themselves: 'Well, they only really mean White men'. Now, I wonder, are such people, some of whom almost certainly lurk in our communities, enjoying reaping the fruits of the anti-White attitudes that they assist in sowing when they believe themselves to be somehow exempt when 'POC' utter some drivel like 'Fk Whitey'? Enjoy being singled out as a target, 'empowered', 'independent' Karens?

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just wait till the "NIGR (No Inmates Granted Release) Act" is introduced.