EQUITY !

submitted by sawboss from (files.catbox.moe)

all 33 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]happysmash27 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Hehe! It's nice to see what actually is a dank meme here, lol!

[–]sawboss[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm new to this idea and still trying to figure it out. Did I do it right?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (31 children)

Equity? As in, value?

Or is this an Agenda 21 joke?

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

this is cambodia after the communists

During the Khmer Rouge’s period of power, at least 1.5 million Cambodians were killed or died, a monumental tragedy from which the country still suffers.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Khmer-Rouge

https://www.britannica.com/place/Cambodia

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

Ah, I get it now. Dank.

I'm quite familiar with this history. An actual Holocaust.

Yeah, that's what they called it.

However, it was the inverse of communism.

Communism is necessarily bottom up. There are only a handful of bottom up organizations in the 20th century.

I'm not any type of overt xyzist.

[–]sawboss[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (27 children)

is it too meta? i'm sad noone gets the message.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (26 children)

It's an unfamiliar image, with a nebulous message.

It wouldn't be dank if everyone got it.

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

But I mean, not even one person got it. You didn't understand it until I explained. That's not good for a meme.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

It's a photo meme about a 45 yr old underreported Holocaust.

I invite you to help me carry my dank banner.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

No porn, please tom

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Also, I haven't missed the irony of being reported by the mod of s/horror.

This is quite interesting, and could be interpreted in many ways.

I might be the Diogenese of SaidIt.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Are you seriously comparing yourself to Diogenes because we don't want you posting a picture of a scrotum for no reason? LOL. C'mon man.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That is not porn. That is Dank Maximal.

Do you ever wonder why there's no major stigma against scenes of gratuitous violence (piled remains, injured victims, corpses, etc.; which is objectively the worst of human behavior), yet a little too much skin is decried as an obscene crime?

These are obvious examples of unnatural learned behaviors.

Young kids run around their homes naked cause it's fun and they think it's funny.

These same children would naturally recoil in horror from a bloody wound, or exposed viscera.

It's easy to recognize that these are natural behaviors, so any change suggests external pressure to confirm to imposed social values.

Why do you suppose this is? Who perpetuates these ideas, and what is their motivation for doing so?

A neatly organized set of polished bones suggests a level of savage indifference that I find almost incomprehensible.

A bulbous bulging ballsak under a jockstrap is awkard and possibly distressing, but it doesn't hold a candle to the genocided remains (IMHO).

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's an upshot picture of a man's scrotum. That's porn lol

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No porn plz

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

I don't understand this response. I don't have any questions.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

That is not porn. That is Dank Maximal.

Do you ever wonder why there's no major stigma against scenes of gratuitous violence (piled remains, injured victims, corpses, etc.; which is objectively the worst of human behavior), yet a little too much skin is decried as an obscene crime?

These are obvious examples of unnatural learned behaviors.

Young kids run around their homes naked cause it's fun and they think it's funny.

These same children would naturally recoil in horror from a bloody wound, or exposed viscera.

It's easy to recognize that these are natural behaviors, so any change suggests external pressure to confirm to imposed social values.

Why do you suppose this is? Who perpetuates these ideas, and what is their motivation for doing so?

A neatly organized set of polished bones suggests a level of savage indifference that I find almost incomprehensible.

A bulbous bulging ballsak under a jockstrap is awkard and possibly distressing, but it doesn't hold a candle to the genocided remains (IMHO).

Aren't you the mod of horror? Surely, you can see the hypocrisy... In these current times.

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

A neatly organized set of polished bones suggests a level of savage indifference that I find almost incomprehensible.

Agreed. Communism is savage.