Sexually violent acts prevalent on major porn sites, new study shows

submitted by killerjavi98 from (christianpost.com)

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Violent porn should be illegal.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Porn should be illegal.

[–]Akali 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

without porn, it will be the 1970 all over again. I'm not convince it's such a good idea.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean 1970 is OBVIOUSLY preferable to 2021. I’d prefer 1950 or even 1850 but I’ll absolutely take 1970 over this sick, SICK hellscape.

I just accidently looked up the word “bobcat” on a search engine with the safe search off. The revolting furry bobcat anthropomorphized animal porn I experienced in that moment was just another HORRIFIC moment in a string of horrific moments that makes up life in the HELL that is 2021.

What decade were you born in that you are not aware that 1970 is literally paradise compared to this progressive shitshow?

Im standing pat on the porn thing.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

without porn, it will be the 1970 all over again

The beavers will be out of control!

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I have a theory that skinny people have more public hair which is why bushes seemed to be bigger in the 70s.

Or at least it looks more compared to the smaller body.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Title is misleading, they found what they considered to be "violent sex acts" in the title. They analyzed just the titles and they discarded titles without descriptions that wouldn't work in this analysis.

That's just such poor methodology you can't draw any conclusions from this.

Anyone even slightly familiar with pornography knows the titles are often grossly misleading. Also according to this article putting "step sister" in the title makes it incest and it takes "drugged or sleeping" literally when it's just (bad) acting.

[–]StillLessons 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Whether the performers are the people they say they are misses the point entirely, which is that the producers are promoting these behaviors. When a shill says, "I brush with Toothex; it makes my teeth so white!" we don't need to believe the performer actually uses Toothex to know this is what the advertiser wants us to use. It's the same in porn. The content is designed to make the viewer want to engage in these activities. Porn producers are promoting culturally suicidal behaviors.

To deny this is the purest of sophistry and flies in the face of common sense.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It doesn't miss the point entirely. Have you noticed the "teen" adult actresses tend to be in their 30s? If you go by the title you'd think people were actually looking at teens when they're not.

It's a sloppy study.

[–]StillLessons 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The 30s actress who is made up to look like a teen is explicitly sending the message to the viewer "You should be fucking teens." The viewer absorbs that message and goes out to look for real teens to fuck (which sadly they far too easily find). You're focused on the details of the process and ignoring the outcome. The outcome is all that matters. Have you noticed? There is a massive pedophilia network operating in the western world, and the United States is one of the three primary sources of girls for this network (along with Mexico and the Phillipines). How the promotion works is trivial compared to the fact that it is working.

Don't get hung up on details. Admit we have a problem. This is the critical first step to start moving the needle back toward sanity.