Elon Musk: “We’re Running Out Of Conspiracy Theories That Didn’t Turn Out To Be True”

submitted by [deleted] from (summit.news)

all 33 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]bucetao6969 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

His witch comment was genius.

Yes, it's really the same as the witch trials. Except the straight white males are now the witches.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah Elon Musk, a walking bag of garbage on two legs. He has about as much intelligence as a dead skunk, and about the same body aroma too. If were ARE running out of conspiracy theories, thank God because it means people are starting to grow brains of their own and do their own thinking free from conservi-tard extremism and hateful small-minded bigotry. Not a single one of the right's conspiracy theories has been proven to be true, yet they have all been 100 percent proven false and the product of very very very small minds indeed.

[–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah Elon Musk, a walking bag of garbage on two legs.

Because he doesn't engage in censorship?

He has about as much intelligence as a dead skunk, and about the same body aroma too.

Yeah he's so dumb he managed to keep Twitter running despite firing 90% of its staff!

If were ARE running out of conspiracy theories, thank God because it means people are starting to grow brains of their own and do their own thinking free from conservi-tard extremism and hateful small-minded bigotry.

Nice gaslighting. He obviously mean the conspiracy theories that are actually coming true. Like the covid vaccines not being "100% safe and secure", especially in the UK.

People are growing brains because they are realizing people WERE right about the vaccine spektics.

The only modern extremists are the woketards, like yourself.

Because trannies keep raping lesbians and people like Amber Heard still think they did nothing wrong, bigotry is pretty based AND justified.

Not a single one of the right's conspiracy theories has been proven to be true, yet they have all been 100 percent proven false and the product of very very very small minds indeed.

That's because everytime someone points out the conservative conspiracy theory was correct, people like you look the other way.

How about you just listen to them without closing the browser tab? Fag, coward.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Elon Musk is a walking bag of dog excrement because he doesn't understand why "free speech" isn't about spewing hate like you do. And you misspelled "skeptics," most of those vaccine skeptics are now dead of the disease they spread misinformation about. And you're very infantile brain wanting to believe that "trannies keep raping lesbians" is about as true as the idea that white people aren't total bigots and wastes of flesh. You've just proven all my points for me. Way to go. You sir, are not just a coward, you're a scumbag in every possible way. SO stuff your opinions back up your filthy ass where they came from.

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The user above me is a troll ignore him

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

I hope more people think of this quote when they think of Elon (who has now made it his official business to spread disinformaiton). Users would avoid Twitter, Saidit and other disinformation-spreading websites....

[–]QuantumLegion 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Disinformation: Information that doesn't align with a person's confirmation bias; any information that may make one question the preconceived opinions fed to them by the MSM; any information, whether true or not, backed up by facts or not, that doesn't align with the propaganda the current establishment wants the majority to believe to conceal or obfuscate the establishment's crimes; any information one doesn't like, makes them uncomfortable, or that may make them Think; any assertion that may cause a disconnect in the childlike desire to engage in "magical thinking" wherein perceived adult figures tell one what to think, and believe thereby relieving them of the burden and/or responsibility of reason, logic and examination of facts

Note: Often characterized by a child-like desire to think of authority figures as a type of "parental" figure who should be believed regardless of established or even new facts which may cast doubt on those parental figures integrity or honesty

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

You know that's not the definition. It's also easy to spot a lie, in most cases. Try it.

[–]QuantumLegion 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

actually, it's quite difficult to spot a lie, esp in written form without physical clues/intuition, or coming from a talking head who's job is to emote certain emotions like any good actor.

Even if you Think something is "disinformation", it would be the height of arrogance to immediately assume you are Right and there is no other interpretation. Many times, something is partially wrong but not wholly wrong, as well.

Logic and scientific method demands we Question first of all; form a hypothesis, then gather evidence to prove or disprove our hypothesis. For example, I went down the Q rabbit hole for about a week. I thought it was bullshit, but I wasn't going to blindly accept the opinion of people I had no reason to trust (the MSM). I wanted to gather evidence for myself, form my own opinion. I went into my inquiry with an open mind ready to gather as much evidence as possible before forming my opinion. Conclusion: Q was bullshit, and even if it wasn't, why would I waste all that time and effort on something I was told was going to happen, regardless. Since it was going to happen (according to them) all I had to do is sit back, and wait for the "inevitable". If events did happen, then I would be proven wrong and I would happily admit I was wrong. But the acts of reading, studying, talking about it constantly was a waste of my time and effort unless I had some overwhelming Need to be one of the "in-crowd", made to feel "special" by operators who use the human desire to feel special for their own ends. I do not.

QAnon ended up being a ridiculous flamboozle. But I could say with all honesty, I came to that conclusion. The MSM has proven, factually, over and over, they are dishonest and have an agenda. They are pure propaganda for 1-party. If there is one thing I cannot abide, it's a liar. If you lie to me once, I no longer believe anything you say. Lying is the ultimate act of contempt for another person. And I do not like being treated with contempt. And what I will not do is blindly believe someone else's opinion. I'm an adult who can reason and think for myself--I do not need to be fed my opinions like a child who doesn't know any better. If you demand I believe you that something is disinformation and demand I not question or inquire, you obviously have something to hide from me, and that is something that I definitely want to know about.

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You're using false comparisons to support some of your arguments. (For example, QAnnon does not compare with the MSM, at all.) Is there absolute truth? If not, what's reliable? Those are easy to answer.

[–]QuantumLegion 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Did you read my reply? I said the MSM said that QAnon was disinformation. I decided to find out for myself. They were right, but hell, a broken clock is right once a day> I did not say Qanon compared to the MSM

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Yes, though you wrote this:

QAnon ended up being a ridiculous flamboozle. But I could say with all honesty, I came to that conclusion. The MSM has proven, factually, over and over, they are dishonest and have an agenda.

You're discussing QAnon and MSM as if they compare in terms of the reliabiility of their source material (or lack thereof)

[–]QuantumLegion 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Dude....where did you even get that idea. I never said anything even close to that

[–]bucetao6969 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You replied to him 5 times already with your logical arguments. There's no winning him, he already made up his mind. He's selectively picking up words to TRY and win against you, he is NOT willing to be debated.

[–]QuantumLegion 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you are absolutely correct, good sir. Salut

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Saidit's not a computer game.

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I quoted you.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Admit it, you love the controversy of stirring up topics to promote alternative narratives.

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Sure - but the issue here is fraud, lies, division, &c, not controversy.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Division is created when a narrative does not allow for questioning, and censors legitimate study and legitimate statistics which are contrary to that narrative. It is controversial to deny a person the right to an opinion and to deny them employment for those views. It is also fraudulent to demand people fund a profitable medical enterprise with limited scope of testing on the premise that it is without harm, while denying the existence of high negative outcome. It goes both ways, brother.

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It goes both ways, brother.

Not in the civilized world.

Live in a medieval world where those in power can make any claim they want, or live in a democracy where 300 years of scientific research is responsible for your health and wellbeing (and your socialist country, free healthcare, and the internet, your flights to Europe, etc, etc ....why do you need this explained to you? I genuinely don't understand how the anti-science movement has developed. It's insane.).

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Science is defined as being systematic study, the questioning of the nature of things. It is anti-science for example to promote the sale of a vaccine based on limited supporting testing and evidence, more anti-science to deny study that demonstrates that it might be dangerous for some people. It is anti-science to falsely push the idea of a conspiracy being false when it is clearly true.

[–]FrancisIsNotCatholic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I saw they were mocking scientific method spring 2020. So I remained pureblood. Its much worse than I thought

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No - it's anti-science to make unfounded arguments against the well-researched and well-tested results of the scientific community, all because of financial profit for influencing others with disinformation. Science is more than a systematic study. Medieval philosophers made systematic studies. Classical science is mathematical, involving the scientific method. Mohammad I Adil is not basing opinions on any of that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"Take this vaccine, young people"

"Has it been tested for safety in young people to ensure it doesn't have dangerous side effects such as cardiovascular problems?"

"Fu#@#@#@" you are anti-science! How dare you question the science!?!"

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again, your approach is to avoid the facts and focus instead on a scenario where two chimps fling poop at each other.

[–]alladd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The analogy doesn't really hold because witch burning was overseen by local churches in coordination with governments, meaning it was an action of the state, whereas YouTube demonetizing Russell Brand is the action of a private company, probably to protect its shareholders.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The UK government has been found to be sending letters requesting platforms demonize Russell Brand. So it is likely that YouTube acted on request by the state.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2023/09/21/rumble-slams-disturbing-request-from-uk-government-over-russell-brands-content/

[–]QuantumLegion 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The second a private company and govt collude, it crosses the line into Fascism

[–]FrancisIsNotCatholic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's one: Francis isn't Catholic, his church is not Catholic, we're in great apostasy. Catholic Church exists, in eclipse. Very tiny. When Catholics get a pope, Catholics will destroy NWO.